首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Social Expectations Bias Decision-Making in Uncertain Inter-Personal Situations
【2h】

Social Expectations Bias Decision-Making in Uncertain Inter-Personal Situations

机译:不确定的人际关系中的社会期望偏差决策

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Understanding the role that social cues have on interpersonal choice, and their susceptibility to contextual effects, is of core importance to models of social decision-making. Language, on the other hand, is one of the main means of communication during social interactions in our culture. The present experiments tested whether positive and negative linguistic descriptions of alleged partners in a modified Ultimatum Game biased decisions made to the same set of offers, and whether the contextual uncertainty of the game modulated this biasing effect. The results showed that in an uncertain context, the same offers were accepted with higher probability when they were preceded by positive rather than by negative valenced trait-words. Participants also accepted fair offers with higher probability than unfair offers, but this effect did not interact with the valence of the social descriptive words. In addition, the speed of the decision was affected by valence: acceptance choices were faster when they followed a positive adjective, whereas rejection responses were faster after a negative-valenced word. However, these effects were highly reduced when the uncertainty was eliminated from the game. This suggests that positive and negative relevant social information can bias decisions made to the same pieces of evidence during interpersonal interactions, but that this mainly takes place when the uncertainty associated with the choices is high.
机译:理解社交线索对人际选择的作用及其对语境影响的敏感性,对于社交决策模型至关重要。另一方面,语言是我们文化中社会互动过程中的主要交流手段之一。本实验测试了在修改过的《最后通Game》游戏中对所谓合作伙伴的正面和负面语言描述是否偏向对同一组要约的决策,以及游戏的上下文不确定性是否调节了这种偏见效果。结果表明,在不确定的情况下,当相同的要约之前带有正价而不是负价价特质词时,它们被接受的可能性更高。参与者也接受不公平要约的可能性要高于不公平要约,但是这种效果并未与社交描述词的效价发生相互作用。此外,决定的速度还受价的影响:接受选择后跟随正形容词的选择会更快,而拒绝选择后的拒绝响应会更快。但是,当消除不确定性时,这些影响会大大降低。这表明在人际交往过程中,正面和负面的相关社会信息可能会使对相同证据做出的决策产生偏见,但这主要发生在与选择相关的不确定性很高的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号