首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Reconciling Apparent Conflicts between Mitochondrial and Nuclear Phylogenies in African Elephants
【2h】

Reconciling Apparent Conflicts between Mitochondrial and Nuclear Phylogenies in African Elephants

机译:调和非洲大象的线粒体和核系统发育之间的明显冲突

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Conservation strategies for African elephants would be advanced by resolution of conflicting claims that they comprise one, two, three or four taxonomic groups, and by development of genetic markers that establish more incisively the provenance of confiscated ivory. We addressed these related issues by genotyping 555 elephants from across Africa with microsatellite markers, developing a method to identify those loci most effective at geographic assignment of elephants (or their ivory), and conducting novel analyses of continent-wide datasets of mitochondrial DNA. Results showed that nuclear genetic diversity was partitioned into two clusters, corresponding to African forest elephants (99.5% Cluster-1) and African savanna elephants (99.4% Cluster-2). Hybrid individuals were rare. In a comparison of basal forest “F” and savanna “S” mtDNA clade distributions to nuclear DNA partitions, forest elephant nuclear genotypes occurred only in populations in which S clade mtDNA was absent, suggesting that nuclear partitioning corresponds to the presence or absence of S clade mtDNA. We reanalyzed African elephant mtDNA sequences from 81 locales spanning the continent and discovered that S clade mtDNA was completely absent among elephants at all 30 sampled tropical forest locales. The distribution of savanna nuclear DNA and S clade mtDNA corresponded closely to range boundaries traditionally ascribed to the savanna elephant species based on habitat and morphology. Further, a reanalysis of nuclear genetic assignment results suggested that West African elephants do not comprise a distinct third species. Finally, we show that some DNA markers will be more useful than others for determining the geographic origins of illegal ivory. These findings resolve the apparent incongruence between mtDNA and nuclear genetic patterns that has confounded the taxonomy of African elephants, affirm the limitations of using mtDNA patterns to infer elephant systematics or population structure, and strongly support the existence of two elephant species in Africa.
机译:通过解决相互矛盾的宣称它们包括一个,两个,三个或四个生物分类群的说法,以及通过开发能够更精确地确定被没收的象牙来源的遗传标记,非洲大象的保护策略将得到改善。我们通过使用微卫星标记对来自非洲的555头大象进行基因分型,开发了一种方法来识别在大象(或其象牙)的地理分配方面最有效的基因座,并对整个线粒体DNA数据进行了新颖的分析,从而解决了这些相关问题。结果表明,核遗传多样性被分为两个簇,分别对应于非洲森林象(99.5%簇-1)和非洲大草原象(99.4%簇-2)。杂种个体很少见。在比较基础森林“ F”和热带草原“ S”的mtDNA进化枝分布与核DNA分区时,森林象的核基因型仅出现在没有S进化枝mtDNA的种群中,这表明核分区对应于S的存在与否。进化枝mtDNA。我们对整个非洲大陆的81个地区的非洲大象mtDNA序列进行了重新分析,发现在所有30个采样的热带森林地区中,大象中均不存在S进化枝mtDNA。稀树草原核DNA和S枝条mtDNA的分布与根据栖息地和形态传统上被赋予稀树草原象种的范围边界紧密对应。此外,对核遗传分配结果的重新分析表明,西非大象不包含明显的第三种。最后,我们证明了某些DNA标记在确定非法象牙的地理起源方面将比其他标记更有用。这些发现解决了mtDNA与核基因模式之间明显的不一致之处,这混淆了非洲大象的分类学,确认了使用mtDNA模式推断大象系统或种群结构的局限性,并强烈支持非洲两种大象物种的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号