首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Systems Approach to Studying Animal Sociality: Individual Position versus Group Organization in Dynamic Social Network Models
【2h】

Systems Approach to Studying Animal Sociality: Individual Position versus Group Organization in Dynamic Social Network Models

机译:研究动物社会性的系统方法:动态社会网络模型中的个人位置与群体组织

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Social networks can be used to represent group structure as a network of interacting components, and also to quantify both the position of each individual and the global properties of a group. In a series of simulation experiments based on dynamic social networks, we test the prediction that social behaviors that help individuals reach prominence within their social group may conflict with their potential to benefit from their social environment. In addition to cases where individuals were able to benefit from improving both their personal relative importance and group organization, using only simple rules of social affiliation we were able to obtain results in which individuals would face a trade-off between these factors. While selection would favor (or work against) social behaviors that concordantly increase (or decrease, respectively) fitness at both individual and group level, when these factors conflict with each other the eventual selective pressure would depend on the relative returns individuals get from their social environment and their position within it. The presented results highlight the importance of a systems approach to studying animal sociality, in which the effects of social behaviors should be viewed not only through the benefits that those provide to individuals, but also in terms of how they affect broader social environment and how in turn this is reflected back on an individual's fitness.
机译:社交网络可用于将群体结构表示为相互作用的组成部分的网络,也可量化每个人的位置和群体的整体属性。在基于动态社交网络的一系列模拟实验中,我们测试了以下预测:有助于个人在其社交群体中脱颖而出的社交行为可能与他们从社交环境中受益的潜力发生冲突。除了个人能够从提高个人相对重要性和团体组织中受益的情况之外,仅使用简单的社会隶属关系规则,我们就能获得结果,使个人在这些因素之间进行权衡。虽然选择会偏爱(或反对)在个人和群体层面上适度增加(或减少)适应性的社会行为,但当这些因素相互冲突时,最终的选择压力将取决于个体从其社会中获得的相对回报。环境及其在其中的位置。提出的结果强调了研究动物社会性的系统方法的重要性,在这种方法中,不仅应通过社会行为给个人带来的利益来考察社会行为的影响,而且还应从它们如何影响更广泛的社会环境以及如何影响动物行为的角度来进行研究。反过来,这又反映了一个人的健康状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号