首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>NPG Open Access >Blood pressure changes after renal denervation at 10 European expert centers
【2h】

Blood pressure changes after renal denervation at 10 European expert centers

机译:10家欧洲专家中心进行了肾脏去神经后的血压变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We did a subject-level meta-analysis of the changes (Δ) in blood pressure (BP) observed 3 and 6 months after renal denervation (RDN) at 10 European centers. Recruited patients (n=109; 46.8% women; mean age 58.2 years) had essential hypertension confirmed by ambulatory BP. From baseline to 6 months, treatment score declined slightly from 4.7 to 4.4 drugs per day. Systolic/diastolic BP fell by 17.6/7.1 mm Hg for office BP, and by 5.9/3.5, 6.2/3.4, and 4.4/2.5 mm Hg for 24-h, daytime and nighttime BP (P⩽0.03 for all). In 47 patients with 3- and 6-month ambulatory measurements, systolic BP did not change between these two time points (P⩾0.08). Normalization was a systolic BP of <140 mm Hg on office measurement or <130 mm Hg on 24-h monitoring and improvement was a fall of ⩾10 mm Hg, irrespective of measurement technique. For office BP, at 6 months, normalization, improvement or no decrease occurred in 22.9, 59.6 and 22.9% of patients, respectively; for 24-h BP, these proportions were 14.7, 31.2 and 34.9%, respectively. Higher baseline BP predicted greater BP fall at follow-up; higher baseline serum creatinine was associated with lower probability of improvement of 24-h BP (odds ratio for 20-μmol l−1 increase, 0.60; P=0.05) and higher probability of experiencing no BP decrease (OR, 1.66; P=0.01). In conclusion, BP responses to RDN include regression-to-the-mean and remain to be consolidated in randomized trials based on ambulatory BP monitoring. For now, RDN should remain the last resort in patients in whom all other ways to control BP failed, and it must be cautiously used in patients with renal impairment.
机译:我们对10个欧洲中心的肾脏去神经(RDN)后3和6个月观察到的血压(BP)的变化(Δ)进行了受试者水平的荟萃分析。招募的患者(n = 109;女性46.8%;平均年龄58.2岁)通过门诊BP证实患有原发性高血压。从基线到6个月,治疗评分从每天4.7药物轻微下降到4.4。办公室血压的收缩压/舒张压下降17.6 / 7.1mmmmHg,白天和夜间血压下降24 / h的5.9 / 3.5、6.2 / 3.4和4.4 / 2.5mmmmHg(全部为P⩽0.03)。在47个月的3个月和6个月的非卧床检查中,收缩压在这两个时间点之间没有变化(P⩾0.08)。正常化是在办公室测量时收缩压<140 mm Hg或在24小时监测时<130 mm Hg,而改善是下降了10 improvementmm aHg,与测量技术无关。对于办公室血压,在6个月时,分别有22.9%,59.6和22.9%的患者恢复正常,好转或没有下降;对于24小时血压,这些比例分别为14.7%,31.2%和34.9%。较高的基线血压预示随访时血压下降更大。较高的基线血清肌酐与24 h BP改善的可能性较低(20-μmol -1 增加的比值,0.60; P = 0.05)和无BP降低的可能性较高(或1.66; P = 0.01)。总之,BP对RDN的反应包括均值回归,并且仍需要在基于动态BP监测的随机试验中进行合并。目前,对于其他所有无法控制BP的方法均无效的患者,RDN应该仍然是他们的最后选择,在肾功能不全的患者中必须谨慎使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号