首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>NPG Open Access >Surfactant therapy and antibiotics in neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Surfactant therapy and antibiotics in neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:胎粪吸入综合征新生儿中的表面活性剂治疗和抗生素:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), a common cause of respiratory failure in neonates, is associated with high mortality and morbidity. The objectives of this review were to evaluate the effects of administration of (a) surfactant—either as lung lavage (SLL) or bolus surfactant (BS) and (b) antibiotics on mortality and severe morbidities in neonates with MAS. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, WHOLIS and CABI using sensitive search strategies. We included eight studies on use of surfactant and three studies on use of antibiotics. Neither SLL nor BS reduced the risk of mortality in neonates with MAS (relative risk (RR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 1.57; and RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.66, respectively). Both SLL and BS reduced the duration of hospital stay (mean difference −2.0, 95% CI −3.66 to −0.34; and RR −4.68, 95% CI −7.11 to −2.24 days, respectively) and duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference −1.31, 95% CI −1.91 to −0.72; and mean difference 5.4, 95% CI −9.76 to −1.03 days). Neonates who received BS needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) less often than the controls (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.91). Use of antibiotics for MAS did not result in significant reduction in the risk of mortality, sepsis or duration of hospital stay. Surfactant administration either as SLL or BS for MAS was found to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay; BS also reduced the need for ECMO. Administration of antibiotics did not show any significant clinical benefits in neonates with MAS and no evidence of sepsis. Given the limited number of studies and small number of neonates enrolled, there is an urgent need to generate more evidence on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these two treatment modalities before recommending them in routine clinical practice.
机译:胎粪吸入综合征(MAS)是新生儿呼吸衰竭的常见原因,与高死亡率和高发病率有关。这篇综述的目的是评估(a)表面活性剂(肺灌洗(SLL)或推注表面活性剂(BS))和(b)抗生素对MAS新生儿死亡率和严重发病率的影响。我们使用敏感的搜索策略搜索了以下数据库:通过PubMed的MEDLINE,Cochrane CENTRAL,WHOLIS和CABI。我们包括八项有关表面活性剂使用的研究和三项有关抗生素使用的研究。 SLL和BS均未降低MAS新生儿的死亡风险(相对风险(RR)0.38,95%置信区间(CI)0.09至1.57; RR 0.80,95%CI 0.39至1.66)。 SLL和BS均减少了住院时间(平均差-2.0,95%CI -3.66至-0.34; RR 4.68,95%CI -7.11至-2.24天)和机械通气时间(平均差-1.31,95%CI -1.91至-0.72;平均差异5.4,95%CI -9.76至-1.03天。接受BS的新生儿比对照组少需要体外膜氧合(ECMO)(RR 0.64,95%CI 0.46至0.91)。在MAS中使用抗生素并不能显着降低死亡率,败血症或住院时间。发现以MAS的SLL或BS形式使用表面活性剂可以减少机械通气和住院时间。 BS还减少了对ECMO的需求。在MAS新生儿中,抗生素的使用没有显示任何明显的临床益处,也没有败血症的证据。鉴于研究的数量有限,并且新生儿的数量很少,因此迫切需要在常规临床实践中推荐它们之前,就这两种治疗方式的有效性和成本效益产生更多的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号