首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Local and Regional Anesthesia >Local anesthetics for brain tumor resection: current perspectives
【2h】

Local anesthetics for brain tumor resection: current perspectives

机译:脑肿瘤切除术的局麻药:当前观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This review summarizes the added value of local anesthetics in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor resection, which is a procedure that is carried out frequently in neurosurgical practice. The procedure can be carried out under general anesthesia, sedation with local anesthesia or under local anesthesia only. Literature shows a large variation in the postoperative pain intensity ranging from no postoperative analgesia requirement in two-thirds of the patients up to a rate of 96% of the patients suffering from severe postoperative pain. The only identified causative factor predicting higher postoperative pain scores is infratentorial surgery. Postoperative analgesia can be achieved with multimodal pain management where local anesthesia is associated with lower postoperative pain intensity, reduction in opioid requirement and prevention of development of chronic pain. In awake craniotomy patients, sufficient local anesthesia is a cornerstone of the procedure. An awake craniotomy and brain tumor resection can be carried out completely under local anesthesia only. However, the use of sedative drugs is common to improve patient comfort during craniotomy and closure. Local anesthesia for craniotomy can be performed by directly blocking the six different nerves that provide the sensory innervation of the scalp, or by local infiltration of the surgical site and the placement of the pins of the Mayfield clamp. Direct nerve block has potential complications and pitfalls and is technically more challenging, but mostly requires lower total doses of the local anesthetics than the doses required in surgical-site infiltration. Due to a lack of comparative studies, there is no evidence showing superiority of one technique versus the other. Besides the use of other local anesthetics for analgesia, intravenous lidocaine administration has proven to be a safe and effective method in the prevention of coughing during emergence from general anesthesia and extubation, which is especially appreciated after brain tumor resection.
机译:这篇综述总结了在颅脑切除术中进行脑肿瘤切除术的患者使用局麻药的附加价值,这是神经外科实践中经常进行的手术。该程序可以在全身麻醉,局部麻醉镇静或仅在局部麻醉下进行。文献显示,术后疼痛强度的变化很大,从三分之二的患者无需术后镇痛到高达严重术后疼痛的患者的96%。预测更高的术后疼痛评分的唯一确定的病因是经腹腔镜手术。可以通过多模式疼痛管理来实现术后镇痛,其中局部麻醉与降低术后疼痛强度,减少阿片类药物需求和预防慢性疼痛有关。在清醒的开颅手术患者中,充分的局部麻醉是手术的基础。只能在局部麻醉下完全进行清醒的开颅手术和脑肿瘤切除术。然而,镇静药物的使用在开颅手术和封堵术中通常可以改善患者的舒适度。开颅手术的局部麻醉可以通过直接阻断提供头皮感觉神经的六种不同的神经来进行,或者通过手术部位的局部浸润和梅菲尔德钳的销钉的放置来进行。直接神经阻滞具有潜在的并发症和隐患,在技术上更具挑战性,但与手术部位浸润相比,局部麻醉药的总剂量更低。由于缺乏比较研究,没有证据显示一种技术优于另一种技术。除了使用其他局部麻醉药进行镇痛外,静脉注射利多卡因已被证明是预防从全身麻醉和拔管中脱发时咳嗽的安全有效方法,在切除脑瘤后尤其值得赞赏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号