首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Lippincott Williams Wilkins Open Access >Comparison of a new criteria for sepsis-induced coagulopathy and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis disseminated intravascular coagulation score in critically ill patients with sepsis 3.0: a retrospective study
【2h】

Comparison of a new criteria for sepsis-induced coagulopathy and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis disseminated intravascular coagulation score in critically ill patients with sepsis 3.0: a retrospective study

机译:脓毒症3.0重症患者的败血症诱发凝血病新标准与国际血栓形成和止血协会弥散性血管内凝血评分的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recently, new criteria for sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) were developed, including the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) criteria. The objective of this study was to evaluate the new SIC criteria in patients diagnosed with sepsis 3.0. Data from patients diagnosed with sepsis 3.0 after ICU admission were retrospectively obtained from July 2013 to June 2014. Relevant demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were noted. This study included 252 patients. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), modified ISTH-DIC, and SIC scores were higher among nonsurvivors (P < 0.0001). The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (P < 0.001), ISTH (P = 0.001), modified ISTH (P = 0.001), and SIC scores (P = 0.007) were independent predictors of ICU mortality. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve, SOFA had the greatest power for predicting ICU mortality; ISTH or modified ISTH score had greater predictive power than the SIC score. There were strong correlations between SIC score and ISTH (P < 0.0001), modified ISTH (P < 0.0001), the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (P = 0.012), and SOFA (P < 0.0001) scores. More nonsurvivors were diagnosed with DIC using the ISTH and modified ISTH criteria (P < 0.001). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with SIC between both groups (P = 0.055). ISTH score, modified ISTH score, and SIC score were independent risk factors for ICU mortality. Compared with the ISTH and modified ISTH scores, SIC score showed no advantage in diagnosing sepsis-associated coagulopathy or DIC. The application of these three criteria in patients with sepsis 3.0 needs further evaluation.
机译:最近,针对脓毒症诱发的凝血病(SIC)的新标准已经开发出来,包括连续器官衰竭评估(SOFA)标准。这项研究的目的是评估诊断为败血症3.0的患者的新SIC标准。回顾性地从2013年7月至2014年6月获得ICU入院后诊断为败血症3.0的患者的数据。记录了相关的人口统计学,临床和实验室参数。该研究包括252例患者。在非幸存者中,国际血栓形成和止血协会(ISTH)进行了血管内凝血(DIC),改良的ISTH-DIC和SIC评分较高(P <0.0001)。急性生理和慢性健康评估II(P <0.001),ISTH(P = 0.001),改良的ISTH(P = 0.001)和SIC评分(P = 0.007)是ICU死亡率的独立预测因子。使用接收器的工作特性曲线,SOFA具有最大的预测ICU死亡率的能力; ISTH或修改后的ISTH评分具有比SIC评分更高的预测能力。 SIC评分与ISTH评分(P <10.0001),改良的ISTH(P <0.0001),急性生理与慢性健康评估II(P = 0.012)和SOFA评分(P <0.0001)之间有很强的相关性。使用ISTH和修改后的ISTH标准,更多的非幸存者被诊断为DIC(P <0.001)。相比之下,两组中SIC患者的比例没有显着差异(P = 0.055)。 ISTH评分,改良的ISTH评分和SIC评分是ICU死亡率的独立危险因素。与ISTH和改良后的ISTH评分相比,SIC评分在诊断败血症相关性凝血病或DIC方面无优势。这三个标准在败血症3.0患者中的应用需要进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号