首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Johns Hopkins University Press Selective Deposit >Beyond Incentives for Involvement to Compensation for Consultants
【2h】

Beyond Incentives for Involvement to Compensation for Consultants

机译:超越顾问奖励的激励措施

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) strives for equitable collaboration among community and academic partners throughout the research process. To build the capacity of academia to function as effective research partners with communities, the North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), home of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH)’s Clinical and Translational Sciences Award (CTSA), developed a community engagement consulting model. This new model harnesses the expertise of community partners with CBPR experience and compensates them equitably to provide technical assistance to community–academic research partnerships. >Objectives: This paper describes approaches to valuing community expertise, the importance of equitable compensation for community partners, the impact on the community partners, opportunities for institutional change, and the constraints faced in model implementation. >Methods: Community Experts (CEs) are independent contractor consultants. CEs were interviewed to evaluate their satisfaction with their engagement and compensation for their work. >Lessons Learned: (1) CEs have knowledge, power, and credibility to push for systems change. (2) Changes were needed within the university to facilitate successful consultation to community–academic partnerships. (3) Sustaining the CE role requires staff support, continued compensation, increased opportunities for engagement, and careful consideration of position demands. (4) The role provides benefits beyond financial compensation. (5) Opportunities to gather deepened relationships within the partnership and built collective knowledge that strengthened the project. >Conclusions: Leveraging CE expertise and compensating them for their role benefits both university and community. Creating a place for community expertise within academia is an important step toward equitably including the community in research.
机译:>背景:基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)致力于在整个研究过程中实现社区和学术伙伴之间的公平合作。为了增强学术界与社区有效合作的能力,北卡罗莱纳州转化和临床科学研究所(NC TraCS)是北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校(UNC-CH)的临床和转化科学奖的所在地(CTSA),开发了社区参与咨询模型。这种新模型利用了具有CBPR经验的社区合作伙伴的专业知识,并公平地补偿了他们,以向社区-学术研究合作伙伴提供技术援助。 >目标:本文介绍了评估社区专业知识的方法,公平补偿社区合作伙伴的重要性,对社区合作伙伴的影响,机构变革的机会以及模型实施中面临的制约因素。 >方法:社区专家(CE)是独立的承包商顾问。行政长官接受了采访,以评估他们对工作的投入和报酬的满意程度。 >经验教训:(1)CE具有推动系统变革的知识,力量和信誉。 (2)需要在大学内部进行变革,以促进与社区-学术伙伴关系的成功咨询。 (3)维持行政长官的角色需要员工的支持,持续的薪酬,更多的参与机会以及对职位要求的认真考虑。 (4)该角色提供的收益超出了经济补偿。 (5)有机会在合作伙伴关系中加深关系,并建立集体知识,从而加强了项目。 >结论::利用CE的专业知识并对其角色进行补偿,这对大学和社区都有利。在学术界创造社区专业知识的场所是朝着公平地将社区纳入研究的重要一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号