首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Orthopaedics >Does surgical approach influence component positioning with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing?
【2h】

Does surgical approach influence component positioning with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing?

机译:手术方法是否会影响伯明翰髋关节表面置换术的部件定位?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the component positioning of Birmingham Hip Resurfacings implanted through a posterolateral approach with those inserted via a direct lateral approach. Sixty-four hip resurfacings for osteoarthritis were carried out by a single surgeon: 23 through a direct lateral approach and 41 through a posterolateral approach. No significant differences in implant survival, Oxford Hip Scores or complications were found. The mean abduction angle for the acetabular component was lower (p < 0.007) with a posterior approach (mean: 37.5°; range 26–50°) than the lateral approach (mean: 43°; range 30–56°). There was no significant difference in stem orientation, either in flexion/extension or varus/valgus, between the two groups. This study demonstrates that components can be implanted in an acceptable orientation through either approach but that the posterior approach results in greater closure of the acetabular component.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较通过后外侧入路植入的伯明翰髋关节表面置换与通过直接外侧入路植入的零部件的定位。一位外科医生进行了64例骨关节炎的髋关节置换手术:23例采用直接外侧入路,41例采用后外侧入路。没有发现植入物存活率,牛津髋关节评分或并发症方面的显着差异。后路入路(平均:37.5°;范围26–50°)比外侧入路(平均:43°;范围30–56°)低,髋臼组件的平均外展角(p(<0.007)。两组之间在屈曲/伸展或内翻/外翻的茎取向方面无显着差异。这项研究表明,可以通过两种方法以可接受的方向植入部件,但是后方方法可导致髋臼部件更大程度的闭合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号