首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Medical Sciences >Sofnolime with Different Water Content Causes Different Effects in Two Sevoflurane Inhalational Induction Techniques with Respect to the Output of Compound-A
【2h】

Sofnolime with Different Water Content Causes Different Effects in Two Sevoflurane Inhalational Induction Techniques with Respect to the Output of Compound-A

机译:就化合物-A的输出而言,具有不同含水量的索诺芬对两种七氟醚吸入诱导技术的作用不同。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: During sevoflurane anesthesia with Sofnolime for CO2 absorption, the factors affecting the production of compound A (a chemical is nepherotoxic) are still not clear. This study is designed to investigate the effects of different fresh gas flow during induction, the vital capacity induction (VCI) vs. the tidal volume breath induction (TBI) on the compound-A production with a fresh Sofnolime or a dehydrated Sofnolime using a simulated lung model.Method: The experiments were randomly divided into four groups: group one, VCIf, vital capacity fresh gas inflow with fresh Sofnolime; group two, TBIf, tidal volume breath fresh gas inflow with fresh Sofnolime; group three, VCId, vital capacity fresh gas inflow with dehydrated Sofnolime, and group four, TBId, tidal volume breath fresh gas inflow with dehydrated Sofnolime. The inspired sevoflurane was maintained at 8%, the concentrations of compound-A were assayed using Gas-spectrum technique, and Sofnolime temperatures were monitored at 1-min intervals throughout the experiment.Results: The mean and maximum concentrations of compound A were significantly higher in the vital capacity group than the tidal volume breath group (P<0.01). At the beginning of anesthesia maintenance, the compound-A concentration in group VCIf was 36.28±6.13 ppm, which was significantly higher than the 27.32±4.21 ppm observed in group TBIf (P<0.01). However, these values decreased to approximately 2 ppm in the dehydrated Sofnolime groups. Sofnolime temperatures increased rapidly in the dehydrated Sofnolime groups but slowly in the fresh Sofnolime groups.Conclusion: With fresh Sofnolime, vital capacity induction increased compound-A production in the circuit system compared with tidal volume breath induction. However, with dehydrated Sofnolime, the effects of the two inhalation induction techniques on compound-A output were not significantly different.
机译:目的:在七氟醚麻醉中以Sofnolime吸收CO2的过程中,影响化合物A(一种化学药品具有神经毒性)生产的因素仍不清楚。这项研究旨在通过模拟模拟研究诱导期间不同新鲜气体流量,肺活量诱导(VCI)与潮气量呼吸诱导(TBI)对新鲜Sofnolime或脱水Sofnolime产生的化合物A的影响方法:将实验随机分为四组:第一组,VCIf,肺活量新鲜气体和新鲜索非那美;第二组,TBif,潮气呼吸新鲜气体流入新鲜Sofnolime;第三组,VCId,生命力新鲜气体与脱水索非那美一起流入,第四组,TBIDd,潮气量新鲜气体与脱水索非那美一起进入。整个实验过程中,吸入的七氟醚维持在8%的水平,使用气相色谱法测定化合物A的浓度,并以1分钟的间隔监测Sofnolime温度。结果:肺活量组的化合物A浓度显着高于潮气量组(P <0.01)。维持麻醉开始时,VCIf组中的化合物A浓度为36.28±6.13 ppm,明显高于TBIf组中的27.32±4.21 ppm(P <0.01)。然而,在脱水的Sofnolime基团中,这些值降低至约2ppm。脱水的Sofnolime组中的Sofnolime温度迅速升高,而新鲜的Sofnolime组中的Sofnolime温度缓慢升高。但是,在脱水索非尼姆中,两种吸入诱导技术对化合物-A输出的影响没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号