首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Are Metals Emitted from Electronic Cigarettes a Reason for Health Concern? A Risk-Assessment Analysis of Currently Available Literature
【2h】

Are Metals Emitted from Electronic Cigarettes a Reason for Health Concern? A Risk-Assessment Analysis of Currently Available Literature

机译:电子烟发出的金属是否会引起健康问题?现有文献的风险评估分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Studies have found that metals are emitted to the electronic cigarette (EC) aerosol. However, the potential health impact of exposure to such metals has not been adequately defined. The purpose of this study was to perform a risk assessment analysis, evaluating the exposure of electronic cigarette (EC) users to metal emissions based on findings from the published literature. Methods: Two studies were found in the literature, measuring metals emitted to the aerosol from 13 EC products. We estimated that users take on average 600 EC puffs per day, but we evaluated the daily exposure from 1200 puffs. Estimates of exposure were compared with the chronic Permissible Daily Exposure (PDE) from inhalational medications defined by the U.S. Pharmacopeia (cadmium, chromium, copper, lead and nickel), the Minimal Risk Level (MRL) defined by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (manganese) and the Recommended Exposure Limit (REL) defined by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (aluminum, barium, iron, tin, titanium, zinc and zirconium). Results: The average daily exposure from 13 EC products was 2.6 to 387 times lower than the safety cut-off point of PDEs, 325 times lower than the safety limit of MRL and 665 to 77,514 times lower than the safety cut-off point of RELs. Only one of the 13 products was found to result in exposure 10% higher than PDE for one metal (cadmium) at the extreme daily use of 1200 puffs. Significant differences in emissions between products were observed. Conclusions: Based on currently available data, overall exposure to metals from EC use is not expected to be of significant health concern for smokers switching to EC use, but is an unnecessary source of exposure for never-smokers. Metal analysis should be expanded to more products and exposure can be further reduced through improvements in product quality and appropriate choice of materials.
机译:背景:研究发现,金属会散发到电子烟(EC)的气溶胶中。但是,尚未充分确定暴露于此类金属对健康的潜在影响。这项研究的目的是进行风险评估分析,根据已发表文献的发现评估电子烟(EC)用户对金属排放物的暴露程度。方法:在文献中进行了两项研究,测量了从13种EC产品中释放到气溶胶中的金属。我们估计用户平均每天要服用600克粉扑,但我们评估了每天1200克粉刺的每日摄入量。将暴露的估计值与美国药典(镉,铬,铜,铅和镍)定义的吸入性药物的长期允许每日暴露量(PDE),有毒物质和疾病管理局定义的最低风险水平(MRL)进行比较。国家职业安全与健康研究所(铝,钡,铁,锡,钛,锌和锆)定义的注册表(锰)和建议的暴露极限(REL)。结果:13种EC产品的平均每日暴露量比PDEs的安全极限低2.6至387倍,比MRL的安全极限低325倍,比RELs的安全极限低665至77,514倍。在每天极端使用1200抽吸的情况下,发现13种产品中只有一种导致一种金属(镉)的暴露量比PDE高10%。观察到产品之间的排放存在显着差异。结论:根据目前可获得的数据,对于使用EC的吸烟者来说,使用EC所产生的金属的总体暴露量不会对健康造成重大影响,但是对于从未吸烟者来说这是不必要的暴露源。金属分析应扩展到更多产品,并且可以通过提高产品质量和适当选择材料来进一步减少暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号