首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Economics Review >Organizational boundaries of medical practice: the case of physician ownership of ancillary services
【2h】

Organizational boundaries of medical practice: the case of physician ownership of ancillary services

机译:医疗实践的组织边界:医师拥有辅助服务的情况

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Physician ownership of in-office ancillary services (IOASs) has come under increasing scrutiny. Advocates of argue that IOASs allow physicians to supervise the quality and coordination of care. Critics have argued that IOASs create financial incentives for physicians to increase ancillary service volume. In this paper we develop a conceptual framework to evaluate the tradeoffs associated with physician ownership of IOASs. There is some evidence supporting the existence of scope and transaction economies in IOASs. Improvement in flow and continuity of care are likely to generate scope economies and improvements in quality monitoring and reductions in consumer transaction costs are likely to generate transaction economies. Other factors include the capture of upstream and downstream profits, but these incentives are likely to be small compared to scope and transaction economies. Policy debates on the merits of IOASs should include an explicit assessment of these tradeoffs.This research was supported in part by funding from the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).
机译:医生对办公室内辅助服务(IOAS)的所有权受到越来越严格的审查。拥护者认为,IOAS允许医生监督护理的质量和协调性。批评者认为,IOAS为医生增加了辅助服务量提供了经济激励。在本文中,我们开发了一个概念框架来评估与IOAS医师所有权相关的权衡。有一些证据支持IOAS中存在范围和交易经济性。护理流程和连续性的改善可能会产生范围经济,而质量监控的改善和消费者交易成本的降低可能会产生交易经济。其他因素包括上游和下游利润的获取,但是与范围和交易经济性相比,这些激励措施可能很小。有关IOAS优点的政策辩论应包括对这些折衷的明确评估。这项研究部分得到了美国骨科医生协会(AAOS)的资助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号