首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Genomics Society and Policy >Direct to consumer testing in reproductive contexts – should health professionals be concerned?
【2h】

Direct to consumer testing in reproductive contexts – should health professionals be concerned?

机译:直接在生殖环境中进行消费者测试–应关注卫生专业人员吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Direct to consumer genetic testing offered via the Internet has been available for over a decade. Initially most tests of this type were offered without the input of the consumer’s own health professional. Ethical and practical concerns have been a raised over the use of such tests: these include fulfilling the requirement for informed consent, utility of results for health care management and the potential burden placed upon health services by people who have taken tests.These tests now have an application in reproductive healthcare. The advent of non-invasive prenatal testing has facilitated the genetic testing of the fetus using only a maternal blood sample. However, companies offering such tests, for example for aneuploidy, appear to be doing so based on a referral from the mother’s health professional. Preconception or prenatal carrier testing for a range of autosomal recessive conditions can be purchased without the input of a health professional who knows the prospective parents. However, unless the appropriate mutations for the specific population are included in the test, results may create false reassurance. Paternity testing without the consent of the putative father is also available via the Internet, as are tests to ascertain the sex of the fetus, which may be used to select children of a specific gender.Direct-to-consumer tests may support prospective parents to identify genetic risk to their future children, however, it is important that they are aware of the possible limitations, as well as advantages, of these tests. National regulation may not prove effective in ensuring the safety of all individuals involved, therefore international pressure to ensure companies conform to Codes of Practice may be needed, especially in relation to tests that could influence reproductive decisions. However, health professionals have a duty to ensure they are sufficiently knowledgeable to enable them to guide patients appropriately.
机译:通过互联网提供的直接面向消费者的基因检测已经有十多年的历史了。最初,大多数这种类型的测试都是在没有消费者自己的健康专业人员的情况下提供的。使用此类测试引起了道德和实践上的关注:这些测试包括满足知情同意的要求,医疗保健管理结果的效用以及接受测试的人对健康服务的潜在负担。在生殖保健中的应用。非侵入性产前检查的出现促进了仅使用母体血液样本进行胎儿的基因检测。但是,提供此类测试(例如非整倍性)的公司似乎是根据母亲的健康专业人士的推荐来这样做的。无需了解潜在父母的卫生专业人员的帮助,就可以购买针对一系列常染色体隐性疾病的孕前或产前携带者检测。但是,除非测试中包括针对特定人群的适当突变,否则结果可能会产生错误的保证。还可以通过互联网进行未经假定父亲同意的亲子鉴定以及确定胎儿性别的鉴定,这些鉴定可用于选择特定性别的孩子。直接面向消费者的鉴定可以支持准父母进行确定他们未来孩子的遗传风险,但是,重要的是,他们要意识到这些测试的可能局限性和优势。国家法规可能无法有效确保所有相关个人的安全,因此可能需要国际压力以确保公司遵守《行为准则》,尤其是在可能影响生殖决策的检测方面。但是,卫生专业人员有责任确保他们足够的知识,以使他们能够适当地指导患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号