首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Genomics Society and Policy >The oblique perspective: philosophical diagnostics of contemporary life sciences research
【2h】

The oblique perspective: philosophical diagnostics of contemporary life sciences research

机译:斜视:当代生命科学研究的哲学诊断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper indicates how continental philosophy may contribute to a diagnostics of contemporary life sciences research, as part of a “diagnostics of the present” (envisioned by continental thinkers, from Hegel up to Foucault). First, I describe (as a “practicing” philosopher) various options for an oblique (or symptomatic) reading of emerging scientific discourse, bent on uncovering the basic “philosophemes” of science (i.e. the guiding ideas, the basic conceptions of nature, life and technology at work in contemporary life sciences research practices). Subsequently, I outline a number of radical transformations occurring both at the object-pole and at the subject-pole of the current knowledge relationship, namely the technification of the object and the anonymisation or collectivisation of the subject, under the sway of automation, ICT and big machines. Finally, I further elaborate the specificity of the oblique perspective with the help of Lacan’s theorem of the four discourses. Philosophical reflections on contemporary life sciences concur neither with a Master’s discourse (which aims to strengthen the legitimacy and credibility of canonical sources), nor with university discourse (which aims to establish professional expertise), nor with what Lacan refers to as hysterical discourse (which aims to challenge representatives of the power establishment), but rather with the discourse of the analyst, listening with evenly-poised attention to the scientific files in order to bring to the fore the cupido sciendi (i.e. the will to know, but also to optimise and to control) which both inspires and disrupts contemporary life sciences discourse.
机译:本文指出了大陆哲学如何作为“当前诊断”(由黑格尔到福柯等大陆思想家的设想)的一部分,有助于诊断当代生命科学研究。首先,我描述(作为“实践”哲学家)倾斜地(或对症地)新兴科学话语的各种选择,着眼于揭示科学的基本“哲学”(即指导思想,自然,生命的基本概念)和现代生命科学研究实践中的技术)。随后,我概述了在当前知识关系的客体和客体两方面都发生的一些根本性转变,即在自动化技术,ICT的推动下,客体的技术化和客体的匿名化或集体化和大型机器。最后,在拉康的四种论述定理的帮助下,我进一步阐述了倾斜视角的特殊性。对当代生命科学的哲学思考既不与硕士学位的话语(旨在加强规范性资料的合法性和可信度)相一致,也不与大学的话语(旨在建立专业知识的观点)相一致,也不与拉康所说的歇斯底里的话语(即旨在挑战权力机构的代表),而是在分析员的话语下,对科学档案保持平衡的倾听,从而将库珀科学奖(即知道的意愿,但也要进行优化)并加以控制),这既激发和破坏了当代生命科学的话语。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号