首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Cross-cultural differences in somatic awareness and interoceptive accuracy: a review of the literature and directions for future research
【2h】

Cross-cultural differences in somatic awareness and interoceptive accuracy: a review of the literature and directions for future research

机译:跨文化差异的躯体意识和感知力准确性:文献综述和未来研究方向

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This review examines cross-cultural differences in interoception and the role of culturally bound epistemologies, historical traditions, and contemplative practices to assess four aspects of culture and interoception: (1) the extent to which members from Western and non-Western cultural groups exhibit differential levels of interoceptive accuracy and somatic awareness; (2) the mechanistic origins that can explain these cultural differences, (3) culturally bound behavioral practices that have been empirically shown to affect interoception, and (4) consequences for culturally bound psychopathologies. The following outlines the scope of the scientific review. Part 1 reviews studies on cultural variation in spontaneous somatic word use, linguistic expressions, traditional medical practices, and empirical laboratory studies to assess the evidence for cultural differences in somatic processes. Integration of these findings suggests a startling paradox: on the one hand, non-Western cultures consistently exhibit heightened somatic focus and awareness across a variety of contexts; on the other hand, non-Western cultures also exhibit less interoceptive accuracy in laboratory studies. Part 2 discusses the various mechanistic explanations that have been proposed to explain these cultural differences in somatic awareness and interoceptive accuracy, focusing on cultural schemas and epistemologies. Part 3 addresses the behavioral and contemplative practices that have been proposed as possible “interventions,” or methods of cultivating bodily awareness and perceptual accuracy. Finally, Part 4 reviews the consequences of interoception for psychopathology, including somatization, body dysmorphia, eating disorders, and anxiety disorders.
机译:这篇综述考察了跨文化的差异,以及文化间的认识论,历史传统和沉思实践在评估文化和互感的四个方面的作用:(1)西方和非西方文化群体成员表现出差异的程度感知准确度和躯体意识水平; (2)可以解释这些文化差异的机制起源;(3)从经验上证明会影响互感知的受文化约束的行为习惯;以及(4)对受文化约束的心理病理学的后果。以下概述了科学综述的范围。第1部分回顾了有关自发体细胞词使用中的文化变异,语言表达,传统医学实践以及实证实验室研究的研究,以评估体细胞过程中文化差异的证据。这些发现的综合表明了一个惊人的悖论:一方面,非西方文化在各种情况下始终表现出更高的躯体关注度和意识。另一方面,非西方文化在实验室研究中也表现出较差的感知精度。第2部分讨论了为解释这些文化差异而提出的各种机械学解释,这些文化差异在躯体意识和感知正确性上着重于文化图式和认识论。第3部分介绍了被建议为可能的“干预措施”的行为和沉思实践,或用于培养身体意识和感知准确性的方法。最后,第4部分回顾了避孕对心理病理学的影响,包括躯体化,身体变形,进食障碍和焦虑症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号