首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Oncology >Survival Significance of Patients With Low Prostate-Specific Antigen and High-Grade Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy With Brachytherapy
【2h】

Survival Significance of Patients With Low Prostate-Specific Antigen and High-Grade Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy With Brachytherapy

机译:根治性前列腺切除术,外束放射疗法或近距离放射外束放射疗法对前列腺特异性抗原低和高级别前列腺癌患者的生存意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: This study compared survival of prostate cancer patients with low prostate specific antigen level (PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml) and high-grades of Gleason score (GS) of 8–10 with different treatment options (i.e., radical prostatectomy [RP], external beam radiotherapy [EBRT], or external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy [EBRT+BT]).Materials and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database data (2004–2013), and overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and Fine and Gray competing risk model.Results: The SEER data contained 9,114 patients, 4,175 of whom received RP, 4,114 received EBRT, and 825 received EBRT+BT with a median follow-up duration of 47 months. RP patients had significantly better OS than patients with EBRT and EBRT+BT (adjusted HR [AHR]: 3.36, 95% CI: 2.43–4.64, P < 0.001; AHR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.32–3.48, P = 0.002; respectively). There was no statistical difference in PCSM between RP and EBRT+BT (AHR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.61–2.80, P = 0.485), while EBRT had worse OS (P < 0.05). The subgroup analysis revealed that there was no statistical difference in prognosis of patients with age of >70 years old, or PSA levels of ≤ 2.5 ng/ml between RP and EBRT+BT (P > 0.05).Conclusion: RP patients with low PSA levels and high GS had better OS compared to either EBRT or EBRT+BT, while RP and EBRT+BT resulted in significantly lower PCSM, compared to EBRT. Moreover, EBRT+BT and RP were associated with similar survival of patients with age of > 70 years old, or PSA levels of ≤ 2.5 ng/ml.
机译:目的:本研究比较了不同治疗方案的前列腺特异性抗原水平低(PSA≤10 ng / ml)和格里森评分(GS)为8-10的前列腺癌患者的生存率(例如,根治性前列腺切除术[RP],外部放射线治疗[EBRT]或外部放射线治疗与近距离放射治疗[EBRT + BT])。材料和方法:监测,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库我们使用Cox比例风险回归模型和Fine和Gray竞争风险模型对数据(2004-2013),总生存期(OS)和前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)进行了评估。结果: SEER数据包含9,114例患者,其中4,175例接受了RP,4,114例接受了EBRT,825例接受了EBRT + BT,平均随访时间为47个月。 RP患者的OS明显优于EBRT和EBRT + BT患者(校正后的HR [AHR]:3.36,95%CI:2.43-4.64,P <0.001; AHR:2.15,95%CI:1.32-3.48,P = 0.002 ; 分别)。 RP和EBRT + BT之间的PCSM差异无统计学意义(AHR:1.31,95%CI:0.61-2.80,P = 0.485),而EBRT的OS较差(P <0.05)。亚组分析显示,年龄> 70岁或RP和EBRT + BT之间PSA水平≤2.5 ng / ml的患者的预后没有统计学差异(P> 0.05)。结论: 70岁或PSA≤2.5 ng / ml的患者的生存率相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号