首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >Choice deliberation violence: Mental capacity and criminal responsibility in personality disorder
【2h】

Choice deliberation violence: Mental capacity and criminal responsibility in personality disorder

机译:选择审议暴力:人格障碍的心理能力和刑事责任

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Personality disorder is associated with self-harm and suicide, as well as criminal offending and violence towards others. These behaviours overlap when the means chosen to self-harm or attempt suicide put others at risk. In such circumstances, an individual's mental state at one and the same time may be deemed to meet the conditions for criminal responsibility, and to warrant involuntary hospital admission. I explore this tension in how people with personality disorder are treated at the hands of the criminal and civil law respectively in England and Wales: they may be deemed sufficiently mentally well to be punished for their crimes, but not deemed sufficiently mentally well to retain the right to make their own decisions about matters of serious importance to their own lives, including whether or not to continue them. The article divides into four sections. After introducing this tension, Section 2 sketches the nature of personality disorder and the psychology underlying self-directed and other-directed violence. Section 3 addresses the questions of whether people with personality disorder who are violent, whether towards self or others, typically meet the conditions for criminal responsibility and mental capacity respectively, considering in particular whether their underlying desires and values, or their emotional distress, affect their mental capacity to make treatment decisions. Section 4 then considers what we might do to address the tension, within the confines of current legislation. Drawing on The Review of the Mental Health Act 1983, I argue that we are ethically justified in involuntarily admitting to hospital people with personality disorder who pose a serious risk to themselves only if we simultaneously undertake to offer genuine help for their future, in the form of appropriate treatment, social support, and better life opportunities — a provision which, as things stand in England and Wales, is sorely lacking.
机译:人格障碍与自我伤害和自杀,犯罪行为和对他人的暴力行为有关。当选择自残或自杀的方式使他人处于危险之中时,这些行为就会重叠。在这种情况下,一个人同时处于一种精神状态可能被视为满足刑事责任条件,并需要非自愿住院。我探索这种紧张关系,探讨如何分别在英格兰和威尔士通过刑法和民法来对待人格障碍的人:他们在精神上可能被认为足以应付其罪行而受到惩罚,但在精神上却不能被认为足以保留犯罪。在对自己的生活极为重要的事情上做出自己的决定的权利,包括是否继续下去。本文分为四个部分。在介绍了这种紧张关系之后,第2节概述了人格障碍的性质以及自我指导和其他指导的暴​​力行为背后的心理。第三部分讨论的问题是,人格障碍的暴力者,无论是对自己还是对他人,都通常分别满足刑事责任和心理能力的条件,尤其要考虑他们的内在欲望和价值观或他们的情绪困扰是否会影响他们的生活。作出治疗决定的心理能力。然后,第4节考虑了在当前立法范围内我们该如何应对紧张局势。我借鉴《 1983年精神健康法》的审查意见,认为在道德上合理地接受非自愿接纳患有人格障碍的医院患者是合理的,只有当我们同时承诺以其形式为患者的未来提供真正的帮助时适当的治疗,社会支持和更好的生活机会,这是英格兰和威尔士目前所急需的一项规定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号