首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >Climate smart agriculture farm household typologies and food security
【2h】

Climate smart agriculture farm household typologies and food security

机译:气候智能农业农户类型和粮食安全

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One of the great challenges in agricultural development and sustainable intensification is the assurance of social equity in food security oriented interventions. Development practitioners, researchers, and policy makers alike could benefit from prior insight into what interventions or environmental shocks might differentially affect farmers' food security status, in order to move towards more informed and equitable development. We examined the food security status and livelihood activities of 269 smallholder farm households (HHs) in Bihar, India. Proceeding with a four-step analysis, we first applied a multivariate statistical methodology to differentiate five primary farming system types. We next applied an indicator of food security in the form of HH potential food availability (PFA), and examined the contribution of crop, livestock, and on- and off-farm income generation to PFA within each farm HH type. Lastly, we applied scenario analysis to examine the potential impact of the adoption of ‘climate smart’ agricultural (CSA) practices in the form of conservation agriculture (CA) and improved livestock husbandry, and environmental shocks on HH PFA. Our results indicate that compared to livestock interventions, CA may hold considerable potential to boost HH PFA, though primarily for wealthier and medium-scale cereal farmers. These farm HH types were however considerably more vulnerable to food insecurity risks resulting from simulated drought, while part-time farmers and resource-poor agricultural laborers generating income from off-farm pursuits were comparatively less vulnerable, due in part to their more diversified income sources and potential to migrate in search of work. Our results underscore the importance of prior planning for development initiatives aimed at increasing smallholder food security while maintaining social equity, while providing a robust methodology to vet the implications of agricultural interventions on an ex ante basis.
机译:农业发展和可持续集约化的最大挑战之一是在面向粮食安全的干预措施中确保社会公平。发展实践者,研究人员和政策制定者都可以从先前的洞见中受益,他们可以了解哪些干预措施或环境冲击可能会不同地影响农民的粮食安全状况,以便朝着更明智,更公平的方向发展。我们检查了印度比哈尔邦的269个小农户的粮食安全状况和生计活动。经过四步分析,我们首先应用了多元统计方法来区分五种主要的耕作制度类型。接下来,我们以HH潜在食物可得性(PFA)的形式应用了粮食安全指标,并研究了每种农场HH类型中农作物,牲畜以及农场内外收入对PFA的贡献。最后,我们运用情景分析来研究采用“气候智能”农业(CSA)的形式对保护性农业(CA)和改良畜牧业的潜在影响,以及对HH PFA的环境冲击。我们的结果表明,与牲畜干预相比,CA可能具有提高HH PFA的巨大潜力,尽管主要是针对较富裕和中等规模的谷物农民。但是,这些农场的农户类型更容易受到模拟干旱导致的粮食不安全风险的影响,而兼职农民和资源贫乏的农业劳动力从非农业经营中获得收入则相对较不那么脆弱,部分原因是他们的收入来源更加多样化和迁移工作的潜力。我们的结果强调了事先计划发展计划的重要性,这些计划旨在在保持社会公平的同时提高小农粮食安全,同时提供一种强有力的方法来事前审查农业干预的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号