首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Older Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Limitations: Immigration and Other Factors Associated with Institutionalization
【2h】

Older Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Limitations: Immigration and Other Factors Associated with Institutionalization

机译:日常生活活动(ADL)受限的亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民:移民和其他与制度化有关的因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study determined the national prevalence and profile of Asian Americans with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) limitations and identified factors associated with institutionalization. Data were obtained from 2006 American Community Survey, which replaced the long-form of the US Census. The data are nationally representative of both institutionalized and community-dwelling older adults. Respondents were Vietnamese (n = 203), Korean (n = 131), Japanese (n = 193), Filipino (n = 309), Asian Indian (n = 169), Chinese (n = 404), Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (n = 54), and non-Hispanic whites (n = 55,040) aged 55 and over who all had ADL limitations. The prevalence of institutionalized among those with ADL limitations varies substantially from 4.7% of Asian Indians to 18.8% of Korean Americans with ADL limitations. Every AAPI group had a lower prevalence of institutionalization than disabled Non-Hispanic whites older adults (23.8%) (p < 0.001). After adjustment for socio-demographic characteristics, Asian Indians, Vietnamese, Japanese, Filipino, and Chinese had significantly lower odds of institutionalization than non-Hispanic whites (OR = 0.29, 0.31, 0.58, 0.51, 0.70, respectively). When the sample was restricted to AAPIs, the odds of institutionalization were higher among those who were older, unmarried, cognitively impaired and those who spoke English at home. This variation suggests that aggregating data across the AAPI groups obscures meaningful differences among these subpopulations and substantial inter-group differences may have important implications in the long-term care setting.
机译:这项研究确定了亚裔美国人在日常生活活动(ADL)方面的局限性和概况,并确定了与制度化相关的因素。数据取自2006年美国社区调查,该调查取代了美国人口普查的长期形式。数据在全国范围内代表了机构化和社区居住的老年人。受访者为越南人(n = 203),韩国人(n = 131),日本人(n = 193),菲律宾人(n = 309),亚洲印度人(n = 169),中国人(n = 404),夏威夷/太平洋岛民( (n = 54),以及55岁以上的非西班牙裔白人(n = 55,040),他们都有ADL限制。有ADL限制的人中,制度化的患病率从亚裔印度人的4.7%到有ADL限制的韩裔美国人的18.8%差异很大。每个AAPI组的机构化患病率均低于残疾非西班牙裔白人老年人(23.8%)(p <0.001)。在调整了社会人口特征之后,亚洲印第安人,越南人,日本人,菲律宾人和中国人的制度化几率大大低于非西班牙裔白人(OR分别为0.29、0.31、0.58、0.51、0.70)。当样本仅限于AAPI时,年龄较大,未婚,有认知障碍的人和在家说英语的人制度化的几率更高。这种差异表明,AAPI组之间的​​汇总数据掩盖了这些亚人群之间的有意义的差异,而组间的实质差异可能会对长期护理环境产生重要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号