首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Investigating sensitivity specificity and area under the curve of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire COPD Assessment Test and Modified Medical Research Council scale according to GOLD using St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire cutoff 25 (and 20) as reference
【2h】

Investigating sensitivity specificity and area under the curve of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire COPD Assessment Test and Modified Medical Research Council scale according to GOLD using St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire cutoff 25 (and 20) as reference

机译:根据圣乔治呼吸调查问卷临界值25(和20)根据GOLD调查临床COPD问卷COPD评估测试和修正的医学研究委员会量表的曲线下的敏感性特异性和面积

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIn the GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) strategy document, the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale are recommended for the assessment of symptoms using the cutoff points of CCQ ≥1, CAT ≥10, and mMRC scale ≥2 to indicate symptomatic patients. The current study investigates the criterion validity of the CCQ, CAT and mMRC scale based on a reference cutoff point of St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) ≥25, as suggested by GOLD, following sensitivity and specificity analysis. In addition, areas under the curve (AUCs) of the CCQ, CAT, and mMRC scale were compared using two SGRQ cutoff points (≥25 and ≥20).
机译:背景在GOLD(全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议)战略文件中,建议使用临床COPD问卷(CCQ),COPD评估测试(CAT)或经修改的医学研究委员会(mMRC)量表来使用临界点评估症状CCQ≥1,CAT≥10和mMRC评分≥2表示有症状的患者。目前的研究基于敏感性和特异性分析,根据GOLD所建议的圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)≥25的参考临界点,研究了CCQ,CAT和mMRC量表的标准有效性。此外,使用两个SGRQ截止点(≥25和≥20)比较了CCQ,CAT和mMRC量表的曲线下面积(AUC)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号