【2h】

Making Research Matter

机译:使研究变得重要

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We offer a UK-based commentary on the recent "Perspective" published in IJHPM by Thakkar and Sullivan. We are sympathetic to the authors’ call for increased funding for health service and policy research (HSPR). However, we point out that increasing that investment – in any of the three countries they compare: Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom– will ipso facto not necessarily lead to any better use of research by health system decision-makers in these settings. We cite previous authors’ descriptions of the many factors that tend to make the worlds of researchers and decision-makers into "two solitudes." And we call for changes in the structure and funding of HSPR, particularly the incentives now in place for purely academic publishing, to tackle a widespread reality: most published research in HSPR, as in other applied fields of science, is never read or used by the vast majority of decision-makers, working out in the "real world."
机译:我们提供基于英国的评论,评论由Thakkar和Sullivan在IJHPM发表。我们同情作者呼吁为卫生服务和政策研究(HSPR)增加资金的呼吁。但是,我们指出,在他们比较的三个国家中的任何一个国家(加拿大,美国和英国),增加投资必然会导致医疗系统决策者在这些情况下更好地利用研究成果。我们引用以前的作者对许多因素的描述,这些因素往往会使研究人员和决策者的世界陷入“两个孤独”。我们呼吁改变HSPR的结构和资金,特别是目前为纯学术出版而采取的激励措施,以解决广泛的现实:HSPR的大多数已发表研究,以及其他应用科学领域,都从未得到过阅读或使用。在“现实世界”中工作的绝大多数决策者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号