首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision?
【2h】

The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision?

机译:欧盟及其成员国的全球卫生政策:共同愿景?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: This article assesses the global health policies of the European Union (EU) and those of its individual member states. So far EU and public health scholars have paid little heed to this, despite the large budgets involved in this area. While the European Commission has attempted to define the ‘EU role in Global Health’ in 2010, member states are active in the domain of global health as well. Therefore, this article raises the question to what extent a common ‘EU’ vision on global health exists. >Methods: This is examined through a comparative framing analysis of the global health policy documents of the European Commission and five EU member states (France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium, and Denmark). The analysis is informed by a two-layered typology, distinguishing global health from international health and four ‘global health frames,’ namely social justice, security, investment and charity. >Results: The findings show that the concept of ‘global health’ has not gained ground the same way within European policy documents. Consequently, there are also differences in how health is being framed. While the European Commission, Belgium, and Denmark clearly support a social justice frame, the global health strategies of the United Kingdom, Germany, and France put an additional focus on the security and investment frames. >Conclusion: There are different understandings of global/international health as well as different framings within relevant documents of the EU and its member states. Therefore, the existence of an ‘EU’ vision on global health is questionable. Further research is needed on how this impacts on policy implementation.
机译:>背景:本文评估了欧盟及其成员国的全球健康政策。到目前为止,尽管欧盟和公共卫生学者对此领域的预算很高,但对此却很少注意。尽管欧盟委员会试图在2010年定义“欧盟在全球健康中的作用”,但各成员国也在全球健康领域中活跃。因此,本文提出了一个问题,即欧盟对全球健康的看法在多大程度上存在。 >方法:这是通过对欧盟委员会和五个欧盟成员国(法国,德国,英国,比利时和丹麦)的全球卫生政策文件进行比较框架分析来检查的。该分析基于两层类型,将全球健康与国际健康区分开来,并通过四个“全球健康框架”进行区分,即社会正义,安全,投资和慈善。 >结果:调查结果表明,“全球健康”的概念在欧洲政策文件中并未获得同样的认可。因此,健康的构架方式也有所不同。欧盟,比利时和丹麦明确支持社会正义框架,而英国,德国和法国的全球卫生战略则将重点更多地放在了安全和投资框架上。 >结论:欧盟及其成员国的相关文件对全球/国际健康有不同的理解,并且对框架也有不同的理解。因此,关于全球健康的“欧盟”愿景是否存在值得怀疑。需要进一步研究这对政策实施的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号