首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist
【2h】

Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist

机译:利益相关者参与制定合理的优先级:清单

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accountable decision-makers are required to legitimize their priority setting decisions in health to members of society. In this perspective we stress the point that fair, legitimate processes should reflect efforts of authorities to treat all stakeholders as moral equals in terms of providing all people with well-justified, reasonable reasons to endorse the decisions. We argue there is a special moral concern for being accountable to those who are potentially adversely affected by decisions. Health authorities need to operationalize this requirement into real world action. In this perspective, we operationalize five key steps in doing so, in terms of (i) proactively identifying potentially adversely affected stakeholders; (ii) comprehensively including them in the decision-making process; (iii) ensuring meaningful participation; (iv) communication of recommendations or decisions; and (v) the organization of evaluation and appeal mechanisms. Health authorities are advised to use a checklist in the form of 29 reflective questions, aligned with these five key steps, to assist them in the practical organization of legitimate priority setting in healthcare.
机译:负责任的决策者必须将其在健康方面的优先重点设置决策合法化,以使社会成员受益。从这个角度来看,我们强调这样一个观点,即公平,合法的程序应反映当局在为所有人提供充分合理,合理的理由以支持该决定方面,将所有利益相关者视为道德平等的努力。我们认为,对那些可能受到决策不利影响的人负责是一种特殊的道德问题。卫生当局需要将该要求付诸实践,以付诸现实行动。从这个角度来看,我们在此方面执行了五个关键步骤:(i)主动确定可能受到不利影响的利益相关者; (ii)将他们全面纳入决策过程; (iii)确保有意义的参与; (iv)传达建议或决定; (v)评估和申诉机制的组织。建议卫生主管部门以29项反思性问题的形式使用清单,并与这五个关键步骤保持一致,以帮助他们切实组织合理的医疗保健优先事项设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号