首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology >Study on different surgical approaches for acute Lumber disk protrusion combined with Cauda Equina Syndrome
【2h】

Study on different surgical approaches for acute Lumber disk protrusion combined with Cauda Equina Syndrome

机译:急性腰椎间盘突出症马尾综合症不同手术方法的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare the long and short term effectiveness and complications of different surgical approaches for Lumber disk protrusion combined with Cauda Equina Syndrome and find a better surgical method for the disease. In this study, follow up records of 144 patients received conventional laminectomy and minimally invasive decompression and fenestration 48 hours within acute injury of lumber disk protrusion combined with Cauda Equina Syndrome were analyzed. Surgical outcome immediately and 3, 6, 12, 36 months after the surgery were compared to evaluate the effectiveness two different approaches. The results indicated that there are no significant differences regarding age, sexual proportion, body mass index (BMI), visual analogue scale of pain (VAS) score as well as Frankel scores before the surgery, and significant differences VAS score as well as Frankel scores immediately after the surgery. In conclusion, minimally invasive decompression and fenestration can be of the same effectiveness and less complications comparing with the conventional laminectomy.
机译:为了比较不同的手术方法对腰椎间盘突出症合并马尾综合症的远期效果和并发症,并找到一种更好的方法治疗该病。在这项研究中,对144例接受常规椎板切除术的患者的随访记录进行了分析,并分析了在腰椎间盘突出症急性损伤合并Cauda Equina综合征的48小时内的微创减压和开窗术。比较手术后立即和术后3、6、12、36个月的手术结果,以评估两种不同方法的有效性。结果表明,手术前的年龄,性别比例,体重指数(BMI),视觉疼痛模拟评分(VAS)评分和Frankel评分无显着差异,VAS评分和Frankel评分无显着差异手术后立即进行。总之,与常规椎板切除术相比,微创减压和开窗术具有相同的效果,并发症更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号