首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Womens Health >Agreement between patient-reported and provider-reported choice of contraceptive method among family planning patients in New York City: implications for public health
【2h】

Agreement between patient-reported and provider-reported choice of contraceptive method among family planning patients in New York City: implications for public health

机译:纽约市计划生育患者中患者报告和提供者报告的避孕方法选择之间的协议:对公共卫生的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

National data on choice of contraceptive method and subsequent use are critical for monitoring progress toward meeting public health goals in reducing unintended pregnancy in the US. Yet few studies have focused on the reliability of clinically-reported or patient-reported measures of choice of contraceptive method for the range of available contraceptive methods. Among 1,844 women receiving reproductive health care at two federally funded centers in New York City, choice of contraceptive method at the end of the visit from two data sources was compared, ie, patient self-report, and provider-report as recorded in the clinical-administrative database. Agreement between the two data sources was assessed for the sample. Sociodemographic predictors of agreement were assessed using logistic regression. Agreement between the data sources was also assessed on a method-by-method basis using positive specific agreement. Participants were predominantly Latina (69%), foreign-born (76%), and low-income (99% with incomes <200% federal poverty level). Agreement of patient-reported and provider-reported contraceptive choice was highest for hormonal methods (positive specific agreement 94.0%) and intrauterine devices (89.9%), and lowest for condoms (53.5%). In the logistic regression model, agreement was lower among teens aged 16–19 years compared with women aged 25+ years (odds ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.55–0.99). Because teens are more likely to rely on condoms, the logistic regression model was repeated, adjusting for provider report of condom choice; after adjustment, no sociodemographic differences in agreement were observed. National data sources or studies relying on provider-reported method choice to derive estimates of contraceptive prevalence may overestimate choice of condoms. Our findings raise the question of whether condom choice can be accurately assessed by a single open-ended measure of choice of contraceptive method.
机译:关于避孕方法选择和后续使用的国家数据对于监测在减少美国意外怀孕方面实现公共卫生目标的进展至关重要。然而,很少有研究集中于在临床报告或患者报告中选择的避孕方法对各种可用避孕方法的可靠性。在纽约市两个由联邦政府资助的中心接受生殖健康护理的1,844名妇女中,比较了访问结束时从两个数据源选择的避孕方法,即患者的自我报告和临床报告中记录的提供者报告-管理数据库。评估了两个数据源之间的一致性。使用Logistic回归评估社会人口统计学预测指标。数据源之间的一致性也使用肯定的特定一致性在逐个方法的基础上进行了评估。参加者主要是拉丁裔(69%),在国外出生的(76%)和低收入(99%的收入低于联邦贫困线的200%)。患者报告的避孕方法和提供者报告的避孕方法选择的一致性最高,激素方法(阳性特异性协议为94.0%)和宫内节育器(89.9%),安全套最低(53.5%)。在逻辑回归模型中,年龄在16-19岁之间的青少年与年龄在25岁以上的女性相比,一致性较低(优势比为0.74; 95%的置信区间为0.55-0.99)。由于青少年更可能依赖安全套,因此重复进行逻辑回归模型,以调整提供者关于安全套选择的报告。调整后,未观察到社会人口统计学差异。依靠提供者报告的方法选择来得出避孕普及率的国家数据来源或研究可能高估了避孕套的选择。我们的发现提出了一个问题,即是否可以通过选择避孕方法的单一开放式措施来准确评估安全套的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号