首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Interventional Cardiology Review >Lessons Learned from RADIOSOUND-HTN: Different Technologies and Techniques for Catheter-based Renal Denervation and Their Effect on Blood Pressure
【2h】

Lessons Learned from RADIOSOUND-HTN: Different Technologies and Techniques for Catheter-based Renal Denervation and Their Effect on Blood Pressure

机译:RADIOSOUND-HTN的经验教训:基于导管的肾脏去神经的不同技术和方法及其对血压的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The interest in renal denervation (RDN) as a treatment for arterial hypertension has returned with three proof of principle trials that have shown recently RDN to be superior to sham treatment. Nevertheless, many questions about this treatment remain open, including those around the optimal interventional technique and technology. To clarify this important question, the authors designed and conducted the Randomized Trial of Different Renal Denervation Devices and Techniques in Patients with Resistant Hypertension (RADIOSOUND-HTN) trial, which compared three RDN treatment arms in a prospective randomised clinical trial. In this article, they comment on the background and results of this trial, and discuss which conclusions can be drawn from the trial, and which questions remain open for future studies in this field.
机译:对肾神经支配术(RDN)作为动脉高血压的治疗方法的兴趣已经得到了三项原理性试验的证明,这些试验最近表明RDN优于假手术治疗。然而,关于这种治疗的许多问题仍然存在,包括围绕最佳介入技术和技术的问题。为了阐明这个重要问题,作者设计并进行了抗高血压患者不同肾去神经支配设备和技术的随机试验(RADIOSOUND-HTN)试验,该试验在一项前瞻性随机临床试验中比较了三个RDN治疗组。在本文中,他们评论了该试验的背景和结果,并讨论了可以从该试验中得出哪些结论,以及哪些问题仍有待进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号