首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Interventional Neurology >Hemodynamic Changes and Baroreflex Sensitivity Associated with Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting
【2h】

Hemodynamic Changes and Baroreflex Sensitivity Associated with Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting

机译:颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术相关的血流动力学变化和压力反射敏感性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Atherosclerotic carotid lesion is a major cause of stroke which accounts for up to 20% of ischemic stroke. Aggressive treatment of carotid stenosis may prevent stroke. Currently, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are the first-line treatments for severe carotid stenosis. CEA is superior to medical therapy in preventing stroke and cardiovascular death. CAS has emerged as an alternative to CEA in recent years due to its less invasive nature. However, both CEA and CAS may be associated with adverse hemodynamic changes as well as a variation of carotid baroreflex sensitivity. There is no consensus on which of these two methods is more advantageous concerning the procedure-related hemodynamic changes. This article reviews the hemodynamic changes and baroreflex sensitivity after CEA and CAS.
机译:动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉病变是中风的主要原因,占缺血性中风的20%。积极治疗颈动脉狭窄可预防中风。目前,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)是严重颈动脉狭窄的一线治疗方法。 CEA在预防中风和心血管死亡方面优于药物治疗。由于其侵入性较小,近年来CAS已经成为CEA的替代物。然而,CEA和CAS均可能与不良的血流动力学变化以及颈动脉压力反射敏感性的变化有关。对于与程序相关的血液动力学变化,这两种方法中哪一种更有利尚无共识。本文回顾了CEA和CAS后的血流动力学变化和压力反射敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号