首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Iranian Endodontic Journal >Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study
【2h】

Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study

机译:两种螯合剂和激光去除根管根尖三分之一的涂片层:体外比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Smear layer (SL) is produced as a result of mechanical instrumentation of the canal(s). Despite the controversies regarding its removal, the evidence-based trend has shifted towards removing and eliminating the SL. Different methods have been used to remove the SL and the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 18% etidronate and Er: YAG on effective removal of the SL. >Methods and Materials: Fifty straight single-rooted teeth were divided into three experimental groups (n=15) and one control group of five. The canals were instrumented with HERO 642 rotary files up to 30/0.06. In group 1, canals were irradiated with Er: YAG laser; in groups 2 and 3, canals were irrigated with 17% EDTA and 18% etidronate, respectively. In group 4 (control) distilled water was used for canal irrigation. The amount of remaining SL was quantified according to Hulsmann’s method with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (P<0.05). >Results: The results showed statistically significant differences in terms of SL removal among the groups (P<0.05). The amount of removed SL by EDTA was significantly greater followed by Er: YAG laser and 18% etidronate.> Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, EDTA was more effective in removing SL compared to Er: YAG and etidronate.
机译:>简介:涂膜层(SL)是通过对运河进行机械检测而产生的。尽管关于删除SL存在争议,但基于证据的趋势已转向删除和消除SL。已经使用了不同的方法去除SL,该体外研究的目的是评估17%的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA),18%的依替膦酸酯和Er:YAG有效去除SL的能力。 >方法和材料:将50根笔直的单根牙齿分为三个实验组(n = 15)和一个对照组(五个)。运河中装有最高30 / 0.06的HERO 642旋转锉。在第1组中,用Er:YAG激光辐照根管。在第2组和第3组中,分别用17%EDTA和18%依替膦酸盐灌溉运河。在第4组(对照)中,蒸馏水用于渠道灌溉。 SL的残留量是根据Hulsmann的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)方法进行定量的。数据通过Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验进行分析(P <0.05)。 >结果:结果显示,各组之间SL去除的统计差异显着(P <0.05)。 EDTA去除SL的数量显着增加,其次是Er:YAG激光和18%的依替膦酸盐。依替膦酸盐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号