首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences >A Systematic Review of Statistical Methods Used to Test for Reliability of Medical Instruments Measuring Continuous Variables
【2h】

A Systematic Review of Statistical Methods Used to Test for Reliability of Medical Instruments Measuring Continuous Variables

机译:用于检验测量连续变量的医疗仪器可靠性的统计方法的系统综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective(s): Reliability measures precision or the extent to which test results can be replicated. This is the first ever systematic review to identify statistical methods used to measure reliability of equipment measuring continuous variables. This studyalso aims to highlight the inappropriate statistical method used in the reliability analysis and its implication in the medical practice. >Materials and Methods: In 2010, five electronic databases were searched between 2007 and 2009 to look for reliability studies. A total of 5,795 titles were initially identified. Only 282 titles were potentially related, and finally 42 fitted the inclusion criteria. >Results: The Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is the most popular method with 25 (60%) studies having used this method followed by the comparing means (8 or 19%). Out of 25 studies using the ICC, only 7 (28%) reported the confidence intervals and types of ICC used. Most studies (71%) also tested the agreement of instruments. >Conclusion: This study finds that the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient is the most popular method used to assess the reliability of medical instruments measuring continuous outcomes. There are also inappropriate applications and interpretations of statistical methods in some studies. It is important for medical researchers to be aware of this issue, and be able to correctly perform analysis in reliability studies.
机译:>目标:可靠性衡量的是精度或可复制测试结果的程度。这是有史以来第一次系统性的综述,旨在确定用于测量连续变量设备可靠性的统计方法。本研究还旨在突出可靠性分析中使用的不合适的统计方法及其对医学实践的影响。 >材料和方法:在2010年至2007年之间,搜索了五个电子数据库,以进行可靠性研究。最初确定了5,795个标题。只有282个标题具有潜在的相关性,最终有42个符合纳入标准。 >结果:类内相关系数(ICC)是最受欢迎的方法,其中25(60%)个研究使用了该方法,随后是比较方法(8%或19%)。在使用ICC的25项研究中,只有7项(28%)报告了所用ICC的置信区间和类型。大多数研究(71%)也测试了仪器的一致性。 >结论:该研究发现,类内相关系数是用于评估测量连续结果的医疗仪器可靠性的最受欢迎的方法。在某些研究中,统计方法也有不适当的应用和解释。对于医学研究人员而言,重要的是要意识到这一问题,并能够在可靠性研究中正确地进行分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号