首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Israel Journal of Health Policy Research >Health information technology implementation - impacts and policy considerations: a comparison between Israel and Portugal
【2h】

Health information technology implementation - impacts and policy considerations: a comparison between Israel and Portugal

机译:卫生信息技术的实施-影响和政策考虑:以色列和葡萄牙之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in health systems is increasing worldwide. While it is assumed that ICT holds great potential to make health services more efficient and grant patients more empowerment, research on these trends is at an early stage. Building on a study of the impact of ICT on physicians and patients in Israel, a Short Term Scientific Mission (STSM) sponsored by COST Net in conjunction with CIES/ISCTE IUL (Portugal) facilitated a comparison of ICT in health in Israel and Portugal. The comparison focused on patient empowerment, physician behavior and the role of government in implementing ICT.The research in both countries was qualitative in nature. In-depth interviews with the Ministry of Health (MOH), the private sector, patients associations, health plans and researchers were used to collect data. Purposeful sampling was used to select respondents, and secondary sources were used for triangulation.The findings indicate that respondents in both countries feel that patient empowerment has indeed been furthered by introduction of ICT. Regarding physicians, in both countries ICT is seen as providing more information that can be used in medical decision making. Increased access of patients to web-based medical information can strengthen the role of patients in decision making and improve the physician-patient relationship, but also shift the latter in ways that may require adjustments in physician orientation. Physician uptake of ICT in both countries involves overcoming certain barriers, such as resistance to change. At the national level, important differences were found between the two countries. While in Israel, ICT was promoted and adopted by the meso level of the health system, in particular the health plans and government intervention can be found in a later stage, in Portugal the government was the main developer and national strategies were built from the beginning. These two approaches present different advantages and disadvantages. Government involvement in earlier stages could provide benefit in terms of interoperability of systems between different healthcare organizations. However, innovation could be slowed down due to government bureaucracy or lack of leadership.The work provides information in order to understand and improve ICT services. Additionally, it provides input regarding impact of ICT on the physician/patient relationship and national policies in the area.
机译:全世界在卫生系统中对信息和通信技术(ICT)的使用正在增加。尽管人们认为ICT具有巨大的潜力,可以提高医疗服务的效率并赋予患者更多的权能,但有关这些趋势的研究仍处于早期阶段。在对ICT对以色列医生和患者的影响进行研究的基础上,由COST Net与CIES / ISCTE IUL(葡萄牙)联合发起的短期科学任务(STSM)促进了以色列和葡萄牙对ICT在健康方面的比较。比较的重点是患者赋权,医师行为以及政府在实施ICT中的作用。两国的研究本质上是定性的。曾与卫生部(MOH),私营部门,患者协会,卫生计划和研究人员进行了深入访谈,以收集数据。通过有目的的抽样来选择受访者,并使用二次来源进行三角测量。研究结果表明,两国的受访者都认为,引入信息通信技术确实可以增强患者的能力。关于医师,在这两个国家,信息通信技术都被视为提供了可用于医疗决策的更多信息。患者对基于Web的医学信息的访问权限的增加可以增强患者在决策中的作用并改善医患关系,而且还可以通过可能需要调整医师方向的方式来改变后者。两国医师对ICT的采用都涉及克服某些障碍,例如抗拒变化。在国家一级,两国之间存在重要差异。在以色列,信息通信技术是由卫生系统的中等水平促进和采用的,特别是在稍后阶段可以找到卫生计划和政府干预,而在葡萄牙,政府是主要的开发者,并且从一开始就制定了国家战略。这两种方法具有不同的优点和缺点。政府在较早阶段的参与可以为不同医疗机构之间的系统互操作性带来好处。但是,由于政府的官僚作风或缺乏领导能力,创新可能会放缓。这项工作提供了信息,以了解和改善ICT服务。此外,它还提供了有关ICT对该地区医生/患者关系和国家政策的影响的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号