首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics >Longitudinal Assessment of Ovarian Perifollicular and Endometrial Vascularity by Power Doppler Ultrasound in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Cycles in the IVF Setting
【2h】

Longitudinal Assessment of Ovarian Perifollicular and Endometrial Vascularity by Power Doppler Ultrasound in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Cycles in the IVF Setting

机译:能量多普勒超声在体外受精(IVF)妊娠和非妊娠周期中对卵巢滤泡和子宫内膜血管的纵向评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: This longitudinal study aimed to compare ovarian perifollicular and endometrial blood flow (PFBF and EBF, respectively) during the follicular phase in pregnant and non-pregnant IVF cycles.>Methods: Serial transvaginal scans were performed in 15 subjects undergoing IVF treatment. Both PFBF and EBF were subjectively graded (grades 0–4 for PFBF and grades 1–3 for EBF). After confirmation of clinical pregnancy, the treatment cycles were grouped into ‘Pregnant’ and ‘Non-pregnant’ cycles. Ovarian PFBF and EBF were retrospectively compared between the two groups.>Results: In pregnant cycles, the proportion of large (⩾15 mm) follicles with high (2–4) grade PFBF increased with time throughout the follicular phase, and the proportion of large follicles with poor (0–1) grade PFBF decreased. In non-pregnant cycles these trends were reversed. There was no difference in EBF between the two groups.>Conclusion: The pattern of ovarian PFBF but not EBF may be predictive of treatment outcome.
机译:>目的:这项纵向研究旨在比较孕期和非孕期IVF周期卵泡期的卵巢滤泡和子宫内膜血流量(分别为PFBF和EBF)。>方法:在接受IVF治疗的15位受试者中进行了连续经阴道扫描。 PFBF和EBF均为主观评分(PFBF为0–4级,EBF为1–3级)。确认临床妊娠后,将治疗周期分为“怀孕”和“非怀孕”周期。回顾性比较了两组的卵巢PFBF和EBF。>结果:在妊娠周期中,整个卵泡中较大(⩾15mm)卵泡和高(2-4)级PFBF的比例随时间增加阶段,PFBF(0-1)级不良的大卵泡比例下降。在非怀孕周期中,这些趋势被逆转。两组之间的EBF没有差异。>结论:卵巢PFBF的模式而非EBF可能是治疗结果的预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号