首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT >Changing of the Guard: Migrating 16S and ITS Diversity Profiling from 454 Onto Alternate NGS Platforms
【2h】

Changing of the Guard: Migrating 16S and ITS Diversity Profiling from 454 Onto Alternate NGS Platforms

机译:换岗:将16S和ITS多样性分析从454迁移到备用NGS平台

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF) currently operates a microbial diversity profiling service on the 454 GS-FLX platform, targeting various regions of 16S and ITS microbial genes. The recent announcement by Roche to discontinue support prompted us to investigate how this service can be transitioned to alternate NGS platforms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of each platform/target combination for both artificial control samples (known gDNA pools) and natural microbial community samples (soils). Replicate PCR amplicons were generated for several microbial and fungal regions (16S and ITS), and sequenced on the GS-FLX, MiSeq and Ion Torrent PGM platforms. The resulting sequences were identified at different taxonomic levels (phylum to species) and the results for each sample, platform and target compiled. This comparison revealed distinct and reproducible differences between the same samples run on different platforms. While no platform was able to perfectly describe the proportions of the artificial pooled sample, each one showed a high level of reproducibility (< 1% variance). This suggests that PCR bias during amplification gives rise to consistent biases in resulting microbial distributions and confirms this method as a useful tool for comparing samples and monitoring changes, but demonstrate its weakness for absolute quantitation. Between platforms, the long reads of the GS-FLX gave the greatest resolution for microbial identification, followed by the MiSeq. Despite the shorter amplicon size, the ion torrent was still able to provide high resolution profiles of the microbial samples. These results show that currently, the 454 still provides higher resolution data sets for microbial diversity than other available platforms. However, as read lengths improve and error rates decrease, these alternate platforms should provide a suitable transition pathway for researchers interested in profiling microbial diversity.
机译:澳大利亚基因组研究机构(AGRF)当前在454 GS-FLX平台上运行微生物多样性谱分析服务,目标是16S和ITS微生物基因的各个区域。罗氏(Roche)最近宣布停止提供支持,这促使我们研究如何将该服务过渡到备用NGS平台。这项研究的目的是评估人工对照样品(已知的gDNA库)和天然微生物群落样品(土壤)的每种平台/靶标组合的准确性和可重复性。为几个微生物和真菌区域(16S和ITS)生成了重复的PCR扩增子,并在GS-FLX,MiSeq和Ion Torrent PGM平台上进行了测序。在不同的分类学水平(种到种)下鉴定得到的序列,并汇编每个样品,平台和靶标的结果。这种比较揭示了在不同平台上运行的相同样本之间的明显差异和可再现性差异。尽管没有平台能够完美地描述人工收集的样品的比例,但每个样品均显示出高水平的可重复性(方差<1%)。这表明扩增过程中的PCR偏差会导致所产生的微生物分布出现一致的偏差,并证实该方法是比较样品和监测变化的有用工具,但显示出其绝对定量的缺点。在平台之间,长读的GS-FLX为微生物鉴定提供了最大的分辨率,其次是MiSeq。尽管扩增子尺寸较短,但离子激流仍然能够提供微生物样品的高分辨率图。这些结果表明,与其他可用平台相比,当前454仍可为微生物多样性提供更高分辨率的数据集。但是,随着读取长度的增加和错误率的降低,这些替代平台应为对微生物多样性分析感兴趣的研究人员提供合适的过渡途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号