首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes
【2h】

Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes

机译:使用全基因组SNP标记基因型对肉牛的杂种优势建模

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An objective of commercial beef cattle crossbreeding programs is to simultaneously optimize use of additive (breed differences) and non-additive (heterosis) effects. A total of 6,794 multibreed and crossbred beef cattle with phenotype and Illumina BovineSNP50 genotype data were used to predict genomic heterosis for growth and carcass traits by applying two methods assumed to be linearly proportional to heterosis. The methods were as follows: 1) retained heterozygosity predicted from genomic breed fractions (HET1) and 2) deviation of adjusted crossbred phenotype from midparent value (HET2). Comparison of methods was based on prediction accuracy from cross-validation. Here, a mutually exclusive random sampling of all crossbred animals (n = 5,327) was performed to form five groups replicated five times with approximately 1,065 animals per group. In each run within a replicate, one group was assigned as a validation set, while the remaining four groups were combined to form the reference set. The phenotype of the animals in the validation set was assumed to be unknown; thus, it resulted in every animal having heterosis values that were predicted without using its own phenotype, allowing their adjusted phenotype to be used for validation. The same approach was used to test the impact of predicted heterosis on accuracy of genomic breeding values (>GBV). The results showed positive heterotic effects for growth traits but not for carcass traits that reflect the importance of heterosis for growth traits in beef cattle. Heterosis predicted by HET1 method resulted in less variable estimates that were mostly within the range of estimates generated by HET2. Prediction accuracy was greater for HET2 (0.37–0.98) than HET1 (0.34–0.43). Proper consideration of heterosis in genomic evaluation models has debatable effects on accuracy of EBV predictions. However, opportunity exists for predicting heterosis, improving accuracy of genomic selection, and consequently optimizing crossbreeding programs in beef cattle.
机译:商业肉牛杂交计划的目标是同时优化加性(品种差异)和非加性(杂种)效应的使用。表型和Illumina BovineSNP50基因型数据共6,794头杂种和杂种肉牛,通过应用假定与杂种优势线性相关的两种方法,用于预测生长和car体性状的基因组杂种优势。方法如下:1)保留了从基因组品种分数(HET1)预测的杂合性; 2)调整后的杂种表型与中亲值(HET2)的偏离。方法的比较基于交叉验证的预测准确性。在这里,对所有杂交动物(n = 5327)进行互斥随机抽样,以形成五组,重复五次,每组约1065只动物。在重复试验中的每次运行中,将一组分配为验证集,而其余四组合并为参考集。验证集中的动物表型被认为是未知的。因此,它导致每只动物的杂种优势值都可以预测,而无需使用其自身的表型,因此可以将其调整后的表型用于验证。使用相同的方法来检验预测的杂种优势对基因组育种值(> GBV )的影响。结果表明,杂种对生长性状具有积极的杂种效应,但对car体性状却没有,这反映了杂种优势对肉牛生长性状的重要性。通过HET1方法预测的杂种优势导致变量估计较少,这些变量大多在HET2产生的估计范围内。 HET2(0.37–0.98)的预测准确性高于HET1(0.34–0.43)。在基因组评估模型中正确考虑杂种优势对EBV预测的准确性具有可争议的影响。但是,存在预测杂种优势,提高基因组选择准确性并因此优化肉牛杂交程序的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号