首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrition Journal >A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management
【2h】

A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management

机译:对糖尿病预防和控制随机对照试验中生活方式干预的报告偏倚进行系统搜索和定性审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundScholars have documented presumptions regarding the relationships between diet, exercise, weight, and type 2 diabetes. However, it is unclear to what extent researchers contribute to these presumptions, and how often these relationships are thoroughly delineated within the context of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thus, the aim was to conduct a systematic search and qualitative, thematic analysis of RCTs focusing on lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention or management, to examine how researchers discuss body weight in 1) the rationale and design of their RCTs; and 2) their presentation and interpretation of their findings.
机译:背景学者已经记录了有关饮食,运动,体重和2型糖尿病之间关系的推定。但是,尚不清楚研究人员在多大程度上对这些假设做出了贡献,以及在随机对照试验(RCT)的背景下,多久一次彻底地描绘出这些关系。因此,目的是对RCT进行系统的搜索和定性的主题分析,重点是预防或管理糖尿病的生活方式干预措施,以检查研究人员如何在以下方面讨论体重:1)RCT的原理和设计; 2)他们的陈述和他们的发现的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号