首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Lifestyle Interventions to Improve Glycemic Control in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Living in Low-and-Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
【2h】

Lifestyle Interventions to Improve Glycemic Control in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Living in Low-and-Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

机译:生活方式干预以改善患有居住在低收入国家的2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:随机对照试验的系统审查和荟萃分析(RCT)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Alongside glucose lowering therapy, clinical guidelines recommend lifestyle interventions as cornerstone in the care of people living with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). There is a specific need for an up-to-date review assessing the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for people with T2DM living in low-and-middle income countries (MICs). Four electronic databases were searched for RCTs published between 1990 and 2020. T2DM, lifestyle interventions, LMICs and their synonyms were used as search terms. Data codebooks were developed and data were extracted. Narrative synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted using random effects models to calculate mean differences (MD) and standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Of 1284 articles identified, 30 RCTs (n = 16,670 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis revealed significant improvement in HBA1c (MD −0.63; CI: −0.86, −0.40), FBG (SMD −0.35; CI: −0.54, −0.16) and BMI (MD −0.5; CI: −0.8, −0.2). In terms of intervention characteristics, those that included promoted self-management using multiple education components (e.g., diet, physical activity, medication adherence, smoking cessation) and were delivered by healthcare professionals in a hospital/clinic setting were deemed most effective. However, when interpreting these results, it is important to consider that most included studies were evaluated as being of low quality and there was a significant amount of intervention characteristics heterogeneity. There is a need for further well-designed studies to inform the evidence base on which lifestyle interventions are most effective for glycemic control in adults with T2DM living in LMICs.
机译:除了降低血糖的治疗,临床指南推荐生活方式干预在照顾患有2型糖尿病(T2DM)人基石。有一个具体需要一个跟上时代的审核评估生活方式干预的有效性与人民生活T2DM低和中等收入国家(MICS)。四个电子数据库进行了全面搜查1990年到2020年间发表的随机对照试验T2DM,生活方式干预,中低收入国家以及它们的同义词被用来作为搜索条件。数据码本被开发并提取数据。叙述合成和荟萃分析使用随机效应模型来计算平均差异(MD)和标准化的平均差异(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)进行。确定1284篇,30个随机对照试验(N = 16670人参加)符合纳入标准。汇总分析HbA1c的发现显著改善(MD -0.63; CI:-0.86,-0.40),空腹血糖(SMD -0.35; CI:-0.54,-0.16)和BMI(MD -0.5; CI:-0.8,-0.2) 。在干预特征而言,那些包含使用多个教育组件(例如,饮食,体力活动,坚持服药,戒烟)促进自我管理和在医院/诊所是由医疗卫生专业人员提供被认为是最有效的。然而,解释这些结果时,必须考虑到大多数纳入研究评价为低质量的和有特色的干预异质性的显著量是很重要的。有必要进一步精心设计的研究,告知证据的基础上,其生活方式的干预是最有效的血糖控制在2型糖尿病生活在低收入国家的成年人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号