首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Understanding the Implementation of Sit Less at Work Interventions in Three Organisations: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
【2h】

Understanding the Implementation of Sit Less at Work Interventions in Three Organisations: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

机译:了解三个组织的坐在工作中少的工作的实施:混合方法过程评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Long periods of workplace sitting are associated with poor health outcomes. Interventions to reduce workplace sitting time have had variable impacts, the reasons for which require further investigation. In this paper, we report on a process evaluation aiming to determine the intervention fidelity of three “sit less at work” interventions and to explore barriers and enablers to implementation, using a mixed methods “before and after” intervention study design. Convenience samples of staff were recruited from three diverse organisations to participate in pre- and post-intervention online questionnaires, objective measures of sitting time (using activPAL3™ devices) and post-intervention focus groups. Intervention implementers and key personnel were also recruited to participate in post-intervention focus groups and interviews. The process evaluation found that none of the interventions were implemented as intended, with no consistent reductions in sitting time. Contextual and organisational cultural barriers included workload pressures and the social norms of sitting, competing priorities, lack of management buy-in, and perceptions of where the responsibility for behaviour change should come from. To ensure effective implementation of future initiatives, deeper organisational-level change, requiring buy-in from all levels of management and staff, may be needed to shift organisational culture and associated social norms.
机译:长期的工作场所坐着与健康成果差有关。减少工作场所随身时间的干预措施具有可变的影响,这是需要进一步调查的原因。在本文中,我们报告了一个过程评估,旨在确定三个“少于工作”干预措施的干预保真度,并在干预研究设计中使用混合方法探索障碍和使者实施障碍和使者。工作人员的便利性样本是从三个不同的组织招募的,参加前后的在线问卷,客观措施的客观措施(使用ActivePal3™设备)和后期后焦点小组。干预制定者和关键人员也被招募参加干预后的重点小组和访谈。过程评估发现,没有预期的任何干预措施都没有实施,随身携带时间没有一致减少。背景和组织文化障碍包括工作量压力和坐姿的社会规范,竞争优先事项,缺乏管理层,以及对行为变革的责任应该来自的看法。为确保有效执行未来的举措,可能需要更深层次的组织级变革,需要从各级管理人员和工作人员获得买入,以转移组织文化和相关的社会规范。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号