首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Burns and Trauma >A case study demonstrating tolerance of the gut to large volumes of enteral fluids as a complement to IV fluid resuscitation in burn shock
【2h】

A case study demonstrating tolerance of the gut to large volumes of enteral fluids as a complement to IV fluid resuscitation in burn shock

机译:一种案例研究证明肠道大量的肠内流体的耐受性作为燃烧冲击的IV流体复苏的补充

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Appropriate intravenous fluid resuscitation has improved early post burn outcomes. However, clinical and pre-clinical evidence suggests that enteral or oral resuscitation may complement intravenous fluid administration. While this strategy is often discussed in the context of resource-limited settings, its implementation could reduce overall IV fluid requirements and simplify management during routine care. Conversely, concerns about this strategy have been raised over impaired gut perfusion and function leading to adverse effects. We present a case of an 82-year-old man with a total burn size of 14% who was encouraged to ingest the oral rehydration solution Drip Drop® starting 7 hours post-burn. In the ensuing 17 hours he consumed over 5 L of oral rehydration solution, which was nearly 1 L more than the total amount of IV fluids he received. There were no adverse gastrointestinal side effects. This demonstrates tolerance of a significant volume of voluntary oral fluids in combination with IV resuscitation. Clinical trials are warranted.
机译:适当的静脉内液体复苏改善了早期烧伤后果。然而,临床和临床前证据表明肠内或口腔复苏可以补充静脉内流体给药。虽然在资源限制的环境的背景下经常讨论此策略,但其实现可以减少整体IV流体需求并在常规护理期间简化管理。相反,对这种策略的担忧已经过度促使肠道灌注和函数导致不利影响。我们提出了一个82岁男性的案例,总烧伤大小为14%,鼓励摄取口服补液溶液DRIPDRIP®起始后7小时。在随后的17小时内,他消耗了超过5升的口腔再水解解决方案,该溶液几乎比他收到的IV液体总量超过了1升。没有不良胃肠道副作用。这证明了与IV复苏组合的大量自愿口服液的耐受性。临床试验是有保证的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号