首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical and Translational Science >Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
【2h】

Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

机译:不同智能手机屏幕上读取眼表面的影响:一项潜在随机对照研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of smartphone reading on the ocular surface and to compare the various effects of different screens and light conditions on the ocular surface. One hundred nineteen volunteers were randomly divided into: light + organic light‐emitting diode (OLED), light + electronic ink (eINK), dark + OLED, and dark + eINK. Ocular surface examinations, including noninvasive break‐up time (NIBUT), noninvasive keratograph tear meniscus height (NIKTMH), ocular redness, fluorescein break‐up time (FBUT), corneal fluorescein staining, meibomian gland assessment, Schirmer I Test, and blinking frequency, were performed before and after a reading task. Symptoms were evaluated using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS‐Q). NIBUT and FBUT were decreased statistically significantly after participants read on an OLED screen for 2 hours compared with the baseline in light and dark environments, whereas no statistically significant decrease was observed on an eINK screen. NIKTMH was statistically significantly decreased after reading on an OLED screen in light and dark settings, and the eINK screen had a lesser effect on NIKTMH. An obvious increase in the ocular redness, OSDI and CVS‐Q scores was observed after reading on an OLED screen, whereas the eINK screen had a lesser effect on these indicators. Blink rate increased gradually in OLED subgroups during the reading task, whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in the eINK subgroups. Our research suggested that reading on an OLED screen can cause ocular surface disorder and obvious subjective discomfort, whereas reading on an eINK screen can minimize ocular surface disorder in both dark and light environments.
机译:本研究的目的是调查智能手机读取对眼表面的影响,并比较不同屏幕和光条件对眼表面的各种影响。一百十九志愿者随机分为:光+有机发光二极管(OLED),灯+电子墨水(exink),暗+ OLED和暗+ eINK。眼镜表面检查,包括非侵入性分手时间(nibut),非侵入性角色探伤弯液体高度(niktmh),眼睛发红,荧光素分解时间(FBUT),角膜荧光素染色,麦米腺腺评估,席氏松,我测试,闪烁频率,在阅读任务之前和之后进行。使用眼表面疾病指数(OSDI)和计算机视觉综合征问卷(CVS-Q)评估症状。与光线和黑暗环境中的基线相比,在OLED屏幕上读取2小时后,NiBut和FBUT在统计学上显着减少,而在exce屏幕上没有观察到统计学上显着的降低。在光线和黑暗环境中读取OLED屏幕后,NIKTMH在读取OLED屏幕后统计学显着降低,eink屏幕对NIKTMH的影响较小。在OLED屏幕上读取后观察到眼发红,OSDI和CVS-Q分数的明显增加,而eINK屏幕对这些指标的影响较小。在阅读任务期间OLED子组中闪烁速率在OLED子组中逐渐增加,而在EICK子组中没有观察到统计学上的差异。我们的研究表明,在OLED筛网上读取可以引起眼部表面障碍和明显的主观性不适,而读数筛选可以最小化深色和光线环境中的眼表面障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号