首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research >Towards diversity in science - a glance at gender disparity in the Brazilian Society of Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC)
【2h】

Towards diversity in science - a glance at gender disparity in the Brazilian Society of Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC)

机译:对科学的多样性 - 在巴西神经科学和行为的性别差异(SBNEC)一目了然

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Gender equity is far from being achieved in most academic institutions worldwide. Women representation in scientific leadership faces multiple obstacles. Implicit bias and stereotype threat are considered important driving forces concerning gender disparities. Negative cultural stereotypes of weak scientific performance, unrelated to true capacity, are implicitly associated with women and other social groups, influencing, without awareness, attitudes and judgments towards them. Meetings of scientific societies are the forum in which members from all stages of scientific careers are brought together. Visibility in the scientific community stems partly from presenting research as a speaker. Here, we investigated gender disparities in the Brazilian Society of Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC). Across the 15 mandates (1978-2020), women occupied 30% of the directory board posts, and only twice was a woman president. We evaluated six meetings held between 2010 and 2019. During this period, the membership of women outnumbered that of men in all categories. A total of 57.50% of faculty members, representing the potential pool of speakers and chairs, were female. Compared to this expected value, female speakers across the six meetings were scarce in full conferences (χ2(5)=173.54, P<0.001) and low in symposia (χ2(5)=36.92, P<0.001). Additionally, women chaired fewer symposia (χ2(5)=47.83, P<0.001). Furthermore, men-chaired symposia had significantly fewer women speakers than women-chaired symposia (χ2(1)=56.44, P<0.001). The gender disparities observed here are similar to those in other scientific societies worldwide, urging them to lead actions to pursue gender balance and diversity. Diversity leads not only to fairness but also to higher-quality science.
机译:性别股权远未在全球大多数学术机构实现。科学领导层的妇女代表面临多种障碍。隐含偏见和刻板印象威胁被认为是关于性别差异的重要推动力。弱科学表现的负面文化刻板印象与真实能力无关,隐含与妇女和其他社会群体有关,影响,没有意识,态度和对他们的判断。科学社会的会议是来自科学职业所有阶段的成员的会议。科学界的可见性部分地源于将研究作为演讲者提出。在这里,我们调查了巴西神经科学和行为的性别差异(SBNEC)。在15个任务(1978-2020)中,女性占据了30%的目录董事会职位,只有两次是女总统。我们在2010年至2019年期间进行了六次会议。在此期间,妇女的成员数量超过所有类别的人。共有57.50%的教师成员,代表潜在的扬声器和椅子,是女性。与此期望的价值相比,六次会议上的女性扬声器在全议会中稀缺(χ2(5)= 173.54,p <0.001)和较低的研讨会(χ2(5)= 36.92,p <0.001)。此外,女性担任较少的专题讨论会(χ2(5)= 47.83,P <0.001)。此外,男子主持专题师的女演员比女性主持的伴侣较少(χ2(1)= 56.44,P <0.001)。这里观察到的性别差异与全世界其他科学社会中的性别差异类似,敦促他们引导行动以追求性别平衡和多样性。多样性不仅导致公平,而且对高质量的科学提供。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号