首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Medicine >Novel psychoactive substance
【2h】

Novel psychoactive substance

机译:新型精神物质

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Editor – We read with interest the article entitled ‘Acute neurological consequences of novel psychoactive substance use: a retrospective review in a large UK hospital’ by Tanti et al.1 The team have effectively highlighted the high rates of psychiatric comorbidity, unemployment, homelessness and incarceration in this vulnerable group in society. However, the paper may have benefitted from involvement of a clinical or analytical toxicologist to prevent several inaccuracies. Lack of analytical confirmation in any patient is a major limitation; self-reporting of substances of abuse (especially novel psychoactive substances (NPS)) is known to be unreliable. It is misleading to state ‘unfortunately, drug screens do not detect novel psychoactive substances’ since, while basic point-of-care immunoassay-based tests will not detect NPS, analytical confirmation of NPS is now available in several NHS laboratories. The authors refer to testing being possible only ‘by specialised techniques like gas chromatography’; most NHS laboratories have moved away from gas chromatography to ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) or time of flight (TOF) for NPS detection.
机译:编辑 - 我们利息阅读了题为“新型精神物质的急性神经后果的文章:Tanti等人的大型英国医院的回顾性审查”。该团队有效地突出了精神病合体,失业,无家可归的高率在社会这个弱势群体中的监禁。然而,本文可能有益于临床或分析毒理学家的参与,以防止几种不准确性。任何患者缺乏分析确认都是一个重大限制;已知滥用物质的自我报告(特别是新的精神活性物质(NPS))是不可靠的。它误导了州“不幸的是,药物屏幕没有检测到新的精神活性物质”,而基于基于基于基于护理的免疫测定的测试,则在几个NHS实验室现在提供NPS的分析确认。作者指的是仅通过“气相色谱等专业技术”的测试。大多数NHS实验室已经远离气相色谱到超级性能液相色谱(UPLC),串联质谱(MS / MS)或用于NPS检测的飞行时间(TOF)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号