首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Absence of Objective Differences between Self-Identified Addicted and Healthy Smartphone Users?
【2h】

Absence of Objective Differences between Self-Identified Addicted and Healthy Smartphone Users?

机译:自我确定的上瘾和健康智能手机用户之间没有客观差异?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Smartphones are used by billions of people worldwide. However, some psychologists have argued that use of this technology is addictive, even though little research utilises objective smartphone usage records to verify this claim. We conducted an exploratory study to identify whether behavioural differences exist between those who self-identify as addicted smartphone users and those who do not. We gathered retrospective smartphone usage data from 131 Android users and asked them about their past use to compare their perception of their usage against their actual usage. We could not identify any reliable differences between the smartphone activity of those self-identified as addicted smartphone users and other users. Furthermore, smartphone scales are generally good at identifying who believes themselves to be addicted, although they do not reflect objective smartphone use. This study questions the use of self-report measures to diagnosis behavioural addictions without relevant psychopathological constructs and emphasises the need for more rigorous study to conceptualise smartphone addiction.
机译:智能手机被全球数十亿人使用。然而,一些心理学家认为,这种技术的使用是上瘾的,尽管很少的研究利用客观智能手机使用记录来验证这一主张。我们进行了一个探索性研究,以确定自我认定为上瘾的智能手机用户和那些没有的人之间是否存在行为差异。我们收集了来自131个Android用户的回顾性智能手机使用数据,并询问他们的过去用于比较他们对其实际使用情况的使用的看法。我们无法识别自我认定为上瘾的智能手机用户和其他用户的人之间的智能手机活动之间的任何可靠差异。此外,智能手机尺度通常擅长识别谁认为自己是上瘾的谁,尽管它们不反映客观智能手机使用。本研究提出了自我报告措施来诊断行为成瘾而不相关的精神病理学构建,并强调需要更严格的研究概念性智能手机成瘾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号