首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Periodontitis Prevalence Severity and Risk Factors: A Comparison of the AAP/CDC Case Definition and the EFP/AAP Classification
【2h】

Periodontitis Prevalence Severity and Risk Factors: A Comparison of the AAP/CDC Case Definition and the EFP/AAP Classification

机译:牙周炎患病率严重程度和危险因素:AAP / CDC案例定义的比较和EFP / AAP分类

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: This cross-sectional study evaluated the utility of the 2018 European Federation of Periodontology/American Academy of Periodontology (EFP/AAP) classifications of epidemiological studies in terms of periodontitis severity, prevalence and associated risk factors and the 2012 American Academy of Periodontology/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (AAP/CDC) case definitions. Methods: We included 488 participants aged 35–74 years. Measurements were recorded at six sites per tooth by two qualified examiners. The evaluated parameters included pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Periodontitis prevalence and severity were reported using the 2018 EFP/AAP classification and the AAP/CDC case definitions. The data were stratified by recognized risk factors (age, diabetes and smoking status). Results: The 2018 EFP/AAP classification indicated that all patients suffered from periodontitis. When CAL served as the main criterion, the frequency of patients with severe (Stages III–IV) periodontitis was 54%. When the AAP/CDC case definitions were applied, the prevalence of periodontitis was 61.9% and that of severe periodontitis 16.8%. Age was the most significant risk factor, regardless of the chosen case definition. Conclusion: It is essential to employ a globalized standard case definition when monitoring periodontitis and associated risk factors.
机译:背景:这种横截面研究评估了2018年欧洲牙周病学/美国牙周病学联合会(EFP / AAP)的公用事业,在牙周炎严重程度,患病率和相关危险因素和2012年美国牙周病学会方面的流行病学研究的分类疾病控制和预防中心(AAP / CDC)案例定义。方法:我们包括35-74岁的488名参与者。通过两个合格的审查员每牙的六个地点记录测量。评估的参数包括口袋深度(PD),临床附着损失(CAL)和探测(BOP)的出血。使用2018年EFP / AAP分类和AAP / CDC案例定义报告了牙周炎患病率和严重程度。通过公认的风险因素(年龄,糖尿病和吸烟状态)分层数据。结果:2018年EFP / AAP分类表明所有患者患有牙周炎。当CAL作为主要标准时,严重(阶段III-IV)牙周炎患者的频率为54%。应用AAP / CDC案例定义时,牙周炎的患病率为61.9%,严重牙周炎16.8%。无论选择的案例定义如何,年龄是最重要的风险因素。结论:在监测牙周炎和相关危险因素时,必须使用全球化的标准案例定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号