首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Initial Clinical Practicum Stress among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study on Coping Styles
【2h】

Initial Clinical Practicum Stress among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study on Coping Styles

机译:护理学生中的初步临床实习压力:应对风格的横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Nursing students experience various stressors during their initial clinical practicum. As these stressors negatively affect learning and performance, coping strategies are essential. Therefore, this research study explored the relationship between coping styles and stress levels using a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 184 nursing students. Clinical practicum stress and coping styles were assessed via electronic questionnaires, and the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and variance analyses. The highest score for clinical practice stress was for the practical education environment and practical work burden. The total stress score differed significantly according to coping style (t = −2.36, p = 0.020), and the total stress score of the passive coping group was higher. Among the sub-categories of stress, the scores of the education environment (t = −2.68, p = 0.008) and having undesirable role models (t = −2.14, p = 0.034) were significantly higher in the passive coping group. Although practical work burden was the highest stress factor in the active coping style group, the stress on the environment was highest in the passive coping group. The findings show that professors and clinical educators should recognize the various coping styles and incorporate different teaching methods in the clinical setting.
机译:护理学生在初始临床实习期间体验各种压力。由于这些压力源对学习和表现产生负面影响,因此应对策略至关重要。因此,本研究探讨了使用横截面研究的应对方式和应力水平与184名护理学生的便利性研究关系。通过电子问卷评估临床实习压力和应对方式,使用描述性统计,T检验和方差分析来分析数据。临床实践压力的最高分为实际教育环境和实际工作负担。根据应对式(T = -2.36,P = 0.020),总应力分数显着不同,并且被动应对基团的总应力得分较高。在压力的子类别中,被动应对基团中,教育环境的分数(T = -2.68,p = 0.008)并具有不希望的角色模型(T = -2.14,p = 0.034)。虽然实际工作负担是积极应对式群体的最高压力因素,但被动应对集团的环境压力最高。调查结果表明,教授和临床教育者应认识到各种应对方式,并在临床环境中纳入不同的教学方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号