首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >SBS vs Inhouse Recycling Methods-An Invitro Evaluation
【2h】

SBS vs Inhouse Recycling Methods-An Invitro Evaluation

机译:SBS与内部回收方法-体外评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionIn today’s world of economic crisis it is not feasible for an orthodontist to replace each and every debonded bracket with a new bracket- quest for an alternative thrives Orthodontist. The concept of recycling bracket for its reuse has evolved over a period of time. Orthodontist can send the brackets to various commercial recycling companies for recycling, but it’s impractical as these are complex procedures and require time and usage of a new bracket would seem more feasible. Thereby, in-house methods have been developed. The aim of the study was to determine the SBS (Shear Bond Strength) and to compare, evaluate the efficiency of in house recycling methods with that of the SBS of new brackets.
机译:简介在当今的经济危机中,正畸医生用新的托槽替代另类的托槽是不可行的。回收支架可重复使用的概念在一段时间内得到了发展。牙齿矫正医生可以将支架发送到各种商业回收公司进行回收,但是这是不切实际的,因为它们是复杂的程序,需要时间,使用新支架似乎更可行。从而,已经开发了内部方法。该研究的目的是确定SBS(剪切粘结强度),并与新支架的SBS进行比较,评估室内回收方法的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号