首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy (Ramipril Telmisartan Hydrochlorothiazide) Vs Dual Anti Hypertensive Therapy (Ramipril or Telmisartan Hydrochlorothiazide) in Stage 2 Hypertensive Patients
【2h】

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy (Ramipril Telmisartan Hydrochlorothiazide) Vs Dual Anti Hypertensive Therapy (Ramipril or Telmisartan Hydrochlorothiazide) in Stage 2 Hypertensive Patients

机译:三期治疗(拉米普利替米沙坦氢氯噻嗪)与双重抗高血压治疗(拉米普利或替米沙坦氢氯噻嗪)在2期高血压患者中的比较疗效和安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aim: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of ramipril 5mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg (R + HCTZ), telmisartan 40mg plus hydrochlorothiazide12.5mg (T + HCTZ) and ramipril 2.5mg plus telmisartan 20mg plus hydrochlorothiazide12.5mg (R + T + HCTZ) in patients with stage 2 hypertension.>Materials and Methods: A prospective, open label, randomized comparative study was conducted to study the comparative efficacy and safety of R+HCTZ (group 1), T+HCTZ (group 2)and R+T+TCTZ (group3) in 88 patients with stage 2 hypertension without co-morbid conditions. Echocardiography was done to assess left ventricular function. Patients were followed up to 24 weeks and any ADR occurring in this period was recorded.>Results: All the three treatment groups showed significant fall in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to the baseline scores (p<0.0001). Intergroup comparison did not reveal any significant difference. Total number of adverse drug events reported were 15. Group III had higher percentage ADRs. Dry cough (8) was most common ADR. The echocardiography parameters did not change from baseline values with all three treatment regimens.>Conclusion: All three medications were of equal efficacy in patients with stage 2 hypertension without co morbid conditions, failing to prove superiority over each other.
机译:>目标:评估雷米普利5mg加氢氯噻嗪12.5mg(R + HCTZ),替米沙坦40mg加氢氯噻嗪12.5mg(T + HCTZ)和雷米普利2.5mg加替米沙坦20mg加氢氯噻嗪的比较疗效和安全性12。 5mg(R + T + HCTZ)用于2期高血压患者。>材料和方法:进行了一项前瞻性,开放标签,随机对照研究,以研究R + HCTZ的比较疗效和安全性(组) 1),88例无合并症的2期高血压患者中,T + HCTZ(第2组)和R + T + TCTZ(第3组)进行超声心动图检查以评估左心室功能。对患者进行了长达24周的随访,并记录了此期间发生的所有ADR。>结果:与基线评分相比,三个治疗组的收缩压和舒张压均显着下降(p <0.0001 )。组间比较未显示任何显着差异。报告的不良药物事件总数为15。第三组的ADR百分比较高。干咳(8)是最常见的ADR。在所有三种治疗方案中,超声心动图参数均未偏离基线值。>结论:在没有合并症的2期高血压患者中,所有三种药物的疗效均相同,彼此之间没有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号