首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >Sub–Lingual Spray Versus Pearl of TNG as A Provocative Agent for Tilt Table Test
【2h】

Sub–Lingual Spray Versus Pearl of TNG as A Provocative Agent for Tilt Table Test

机译:舌下喷剂与TNG珍珠对比作为倾斜表测试的促进剂

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the false positive ratio of Tilt Table Test (TTT) result by using TNG spray (Sub–lingual; SL) as compared to TNG pearl in patients referred to military service.>Material and Methods: This was a prospective study. It was conducted on 110 cases referred for military service, expressed vasovagal symptoms. We divided the subjects into three groups; first Group (60 cases) used TNG pearl for provoking syncope in TTT, Group 2 (50 cases) and Group 3 (control cases) used TNG spray in the same dose (0.4 mg).>Results: In the first step of tilt study, 10%, and 8% of subjects had fainted on not using provoking drug in cases and controls, respectively. After using the drugs, 36.6%, 96% and 18% showed positive results in pearl, spray and the control groups, respectively (p<0.05).>Conclusion: Rather than pearl group, a 40 minute tilt using TNG spray showed significant higher positive results, which may be incorrectly positive. Using this form of TNG seems not useful for distinguishing and diagnosing vasovagal shocks, especially in subjects referred for military service capacity. For constant evidence, a cross–over clinical trial study is required, involving suspected cases divided into two groups, who both will be examined with spray and pearl.
机译:>目的:该研究的目的是确定与军医患者相比,使用TNG喷雾剂(舌下; SL)与TNG珍珠相比倾斜表测试(TTT)结果的假阳性率服务。>材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性研究。对110名转入兵役的病例进行了研究,他们表现出血管迷走神经症状。我们将主题分为三组:第一组(60例)使用TNG珍珠引起TTT晕厥,第二组(50例)和第三组(对照组)使用相同剂量(0.4 mg)的TNG喷雾剂。>结果:在倾斜研究的第一步中,分别有10%和8%的受试者因在病例和对照组中不使用刺激性药物而晕倒。用药后,珍珠组,喷雾组和对照组分别有36.6%,96%和18%的阳性结果(p <0.05)。>结论:而不是珍珠组,倾斜了40分钟使用TNG喷雾剂显示出明显较高的阳性结果,这可能是错误的阳性结果。使用这种形式的TNG似乎对区分和诊断血管迷走性电击没有用,特别是在以兵役身份转诊的受试者中。为了获得持续的证据,需要进行交叉临床试验研究,将可疑病例分为两组,每组都将接受喷雾和珍珠检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号