首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Global Health >A Critique of Helsinki Criteria for Using Lung Fiber Levels to Determine Causation in Mesothelioma Cases
【2h】

A Critique of Helsinki Criteria for Using Lung Fiber Levels to Determine Causation in Mesothelioma Cases

机译:赫尔辛基使用肺纤维水平的标准批判以确定间皮瘤病例的因果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Asbestos is a known human carcinogen and the chief known cause of mesothelioma. In 1997, a group of experts developed the Helsinki Criteria, which established criteria for attribution of mesothelioma to asbestos. The criteria include two methods for causation attribution: 1) a history of significant occupational, domestic, or environmental exposure and/or 2) pathologic evidence of exposure to asbestos. In 2014, the Helsinki Criteria were updated, and these attribution criteria were not changed. However, since the Helsinki Criteria were first released in 1997, some pathologists, cell biologists, and others have claimed that a history of exposure cannot establish causation unless the lung asbestos fiber burden exceeds “the background range for the laboratory in question to attribute mesothelioma cases to exposure to asbestos.” This practice ignores the impact on fiber burden of clearance/translocation over time, which in part is why the Helsinki Criteria concluded that a history of exposure to asbestos was independently sufficient to attribute causation to asbestos.
机译:石棉是一种已知的人类致癌物和主要已知的间皮瘤原因。 1997年,一群专家制定了赫尔辛基标准,该标准建立了间皮瘤归因到石棉的标准。标准包括两种因果关系归属方法:1)大量职业,国内或环境暴露的历史和/或2)暴露于石棉的病理证据。 2014年,赫尔辛基标准更新,这些归属标准没有改变。然而,由于赫尔辛基标准于1997年首次发布,一些病理学家,细胞生物学家和其他人已经声称,除非肺石棉纤维负担超过“有问题的实验室的背景范围”,否则暴露的历史无法建立因果关系接触石棉。“这种做法忽略了对空间的空间/易位的影响,这部分是为什么赫尔辛基标准得出结论,即暴露于石棉的历史是独立地足以对石棉的因果关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号