首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >136 Reflections on the foundational scientific knowledge of undergraduate animal science students: a three-year study
【2h】

136 Reflections on the foundational scientific knowledge of undergraduate animal science students: a three-year study

机译:136关于本科动物科学生的基础科学知识的思考:三年的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In 2015, the University of Arkansas Department of Animal Science developed a strategy for assessing student-learning outcomes within its undergraduate teaching program. The first recognized outcome states that students will demonstrate foundational scientific knowledge in the general animal science disciplines of physiology, genetics, nutrition, muscle foods, and production animal management. Subsequently, a 58-item assessment tool was developed for direct assessment of student knowledge—focusing primarily on freshmen and senior students. Over the past 3 academic calendar years, 381 students (196 freshmen, 48 sophomores, 19 juniors, 113 seniors, 5 graduates) were assessed, either during an introduction to animal science course or by appointment with outgoing seniors majoring in animal science. Scores were categorized using demographic data collected at the beginning of the assessment tool. Comparison categories included academic class, major, and general student background (rural or urban). Data analysis were performed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS, with student serving as the experimental unit and significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Generally speaking, animal science majors performed better (P < 0.01) than students from other majors, and students with a rural background performed better (P < 0.01) than their urban-backgrounded peers. Overall, senior assessment scores averaged 23-percentage points greater (P < 0.01) than freshmen assessment scores, and the average scores for freshmen and seniors were 43% and 66% respectively. In regards to student performance within each discipline, there was an average improvement of 24 percentage points between freshmen and seniors in all of the measured disciplines except for muscle foods, which only saw a 10-percentage point improvement between the two classes. While the overall improvement in scores is indicative of increased student knowledge, the department would like to see greater improvement in all discipline scores for seniors majoring in animal science.
机译:2015年,阿肯色州大学动物科学部门制定了评估本科教学计划中的学生学习成果的战略。第一个公认的结果指出,学生将在生理学,遗传,营养,肌肉食品和生产动物管理的一般动物科学学科中展示基础科学知识。随后,开发了58项评估工具,用于直接评估学生知识 - 主要关注新生和高级学生。在过去的三个学术日历年度,381名学生(196名新生,48名大二学生,19级小学,113名老年人,5名毕业生),也是在动物科学课程的介绍期间或预约在动物科学中的外出老年人。分数使用在评估工具开头收集的人口统计数据进行分类。比较类别包括学术级,主要和普通学生背景(农村或城市)。使用SAS的Glimmix程序进行数据分析,学生用作实验单元和P≤0.05的实验单元和显着性。一般来说,动物科学专业比其他专业的学生更好(P <0.01),以及农村背景的学生比其城市背景的同龄人更好(P <0.01)。总体而言,高级评估分数比新生评估分数更大的23百分点(P <0.01),新生和老年人的平均评分分别为43%和66%。关于每个学科的学生表现,在所有测量的学科中,新生和老年人之间的平均平均改善除肌肉食品外,只有在两班之间看到了10百分点的改善。虽然分数的整体改善表明学生知识增加,但该部门希望在动物科学主修的老年人的所有纪律比分中看到更大的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号