Resin‐embedded anatomical cross‐sections as a teaching adjunct for medical curricula: is this technique an alternative to potting and plastination?

摘要

With an ever‐expanding use of cross‐sectional imaging for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, there has also been an increase in the need for exposure to such radiological and anatomical views at the undergraduate and postgraduate level to allow for early familiarisation with the relevant anatomy. Cadaveric cross‐sections offer an excellent link between the two‐dimensional radiological images and the three‐dimensional anatomical structures. For such cross‐sections to be useful and informative within educational settings, they need to be: (i) safe for students and trainees to handle and (ii) robust enough to withstand repeated handling; as well as (iii) displaying anatomy clearly and accurately. There are various ways in which cross‐sections can be prepared and presented; plastinated, potted, vacuum‐sealed or unmounted. Each of these approaches has advantages and disadvantages in terms of technical complexity, cost and quality. As an alternative to the above methods and their limitations, we propose the presentation of cadaveric cross‐sections in a transparent polyester resin. This technique has been used extensively in craft and artistic industries, yet it is not publicised in anatomy teaching settings. The sections were layered in polyester resin contained within a mould. The set resin required finishing by sanding and polishing. The final cross‐sections were safe to handle, durable and maintained excellent anatomical relationships of the contained structures. The transparency of the set resin was water‐clear and did not obstruct the visibility of the anatomy. The cost of the process was found to be significantly lower, requiring less infrastructure when compared with alternative methods. The following trivial technical difficulties were noted during the resin‐embedding process: trapped air causing organs to float; retained water in the anatomical specimens creating bubbles and discoloration; and microbubbles emerging from the solution affecting the finished surface. However, solutions to these minor limitations have been discussed within the paper with the aim of future proofing this technique. The sections have been used in undergraduate medical teaching for 4 years and they have shown no signs of degradation or discoloration. We believe that this method is a viable and cost‐effective alternative to other approaches of displaying cross‐sectional cadaveric material and will help students and trainees bridge the gap between the traditional three‐dimensional anatomy and two‐dimensional images.