首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Control : Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center >Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field SimultaneousIntegrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and SequentialIMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)
【2h】

Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field SimultaneousIntegrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and SequentialIMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)

机译:单级临床经验使用全场同步集成升压(SIB)强度调制放射疗法(IMRT)和顺序在术后口腔癌症患者(OCC)的IMRT

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to review clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneousintegrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequentialIMRT in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC). From November 2006to December 2014, a total of 182 postoperative patients with OCC who underwenteither SIB-IMRT (n = 63) or sequential IMRT (n = 119) were enrolledretrospectively and matched randomly according to multiple risk factors by acomputer. The differences were well balanced after patient matching(P = .38). The median follow-up time was 65 months. Forpatients treated with the SIB technique and the sequential technique, therespective mortality rates were 36.8% and 20.0% (P = .04). Theprimary recurrence rates were 26.3% and 10.0% (P = .02),respectively. The respective marginal failure rates were 26.7% and 16.7%. Amultivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients who received theSIB technique had a 2.74 times higher risk of death than those who received thesequential technique (95% confidence interval = 1.10-6.79, P =.03). Sequential IMRT provided a significantly lower dose to the esophagus (5.2Gy, P = .02) and trachea (4.6 Gy, P = .03)than SIB-IMRT. For patients with locally advanced OCC, postoperative sequentialIMRT may overcome an unpredictable geographic miss, potentially with a lowermarginal failure rate in the primary area. Patients treated by sequential IMRTshow equal overall survival benefits to those treated by SIB-IMRT and a lowermortality rate than those treated by SIB-IMRT. Additionally, a reduced dose tothe esophagus and trachea compared to sequential IMRT was noted.
机译:本研究旨在通过全场同时审查临床经验集成升压(SIB)强度调制放射疗法(IMRT)和顺序IMRT在术后口腔癌(OCC)。从2006年11月起到2014年12月,共有182名术后患者经历过OCC读取SIB-IMRT(n = 63)或顺序IMRT(n = 119)根据多种风险因素,回顾性和随机匹配计算机。患者匹配后,差异平衡(p = .38)。中位后续时间为65个月。为了用SIB技术和顺序技术治疗的患者各自的死亡率为36.8%和20.0%(p = .04)。这初级复发率为26.3%和10.0%(p = .02),分别。各自的边际失败率为26.7%和16.7%。一种多变量逻辑回归分析显示接待的患者SIB技术的死亡风险高2.74倍,而不是那些收到的人顺序技术(95%置信区间= 1.10-6.79,P =.03)。顺序IMRT为食道提供了显着降低的剂量(5.2gy,p = .02)和气管(4.6 gy,p = .03)比sib-imrt。对于患有当地先进的OCC的患者,术后连续IMRT可能会克服一个不可预测的地理未命中,可能是较低的主要区域的边缘故障率。序列ICRT治疗的患者向SIB-IMRT和较低的人展示相同的整体生存效果死亡率比SIB-IMRT治疗的率。另外,减少了剂量与顺序IMRT相比,食道和气管被注意到。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号